Scripture texts illustrated by general literatureJacox, Francis
Religion
Scripture texts illustrated by general literature
Jacox, Francis
Homiletical illustrations
In the portion of Jezreel—by a retributive local coincidence—were to lie
the mangled remains of Jezebel—what the dogs should leave of her. “And
the carcase of Jezebel shall be as dung upon the face of the field in
the portion of Jezreel; so that they shall not say, This is Jezebel.”
_This_, Jezebel? how could _this_ be identified with the superb wife and
superior of the king of Israel, as she was in her prime of life and pride
of place? or even with the faded form of her that, newly a widow, but
energetic and manœuvring to the last, and defiant in her fall, painted
her face, and tired her head, and looked out at the window as Jehu
entered in at the gate? Imperious Jezebel, thrice puissant and insatiably
presuming, transformed into a heap of bone dust—reduced to her lowest
terms as mere organic matter—resolved into just so much manure upon the
face of the field.
“Imperious Cæsar, dead, and turn’d to clay,
Might stop a hole to keep the wind away:
O that the earth which kept the world in awe
Should patch a wall to expel the winter’s flaw.”
So muses and speculates Hamlet, on the theme of “to what base uses we
may return, Horatio,” when his imagination traces the noble dust of
Alexander, till he find it stopping a bunghole. ’Twere to consider too
curiously to consider so, Horatio may object. Not a jot, is Hamlet’s
answer to the objection; for look you, Alexander died, was buried, was
resolved into dust; the dust is earth; of earth we make loam. “And why of
that loam, whereto he was converted, might they not stop a beer barrel?”
_Quod erat demonstrandum._
The Prince of Denmark was in the like mood when, in other company, he
talked, to the same purpose, of how a man may fish with the worm[12] that
hath eat of a king; and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm.
Well may Juvenal bid the meditative moralist, _expende Annibalem_,
and expound the text that _Mors sola fatetur quantula sint hominum
corpuscula_. But it needs a Shakspeare to reduce these to their lowest
terms, in the style of Hamlet with imperious Cæsar,—a _reductis ad
absurdum_ indeed.
Sydney Smith somewhere girds at the idea of doctrinaire legislators
making irrevocable laws for men who toss their remains about with spades,
“and use the relics of these legislators, to give breadth to brocoli,
and to aid the vernal eruption of asparagus.” Hawthorne once designed
a symbolical tale of a young man being slain and buried in the flower
garden of his betrothed, and the earth levelled over him. That particular
spot, which she happens to plant with some peculiar variety of flowers,
produces them of admirable splendour, beauty, and perfume; and thus the
classic fantasy is realized, of dead people transformed to flowers.
Sir Thomas Browne—how pregnant his hints are!—touches on Mummy as having
become merchandize: Mizraim curing wounds, and Pharaoh being sold for
balsams.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account