Those cases of successful wrong-doing where a lack of group standards is
involved can be understood if we take account of the network of
relations in which the man lives. The view that success and morality go
together supposes that he is surrounded by fairly definite and uniform
standards of right kept alive by the interplay of minds in a well-knit
group. This is the only guarantee that the individual will have a
conscience or a self-respect which will be hurt if he transgresses these
standards, or that the group will in any way punish him.
But the state of things may be so anarchical that there is no well-knit,
standard-making group, either to form the individual’s conscience or to
punish his transgressions. This will be more or less the case in any
condition of social transition and confusion, and is widely applicable
to our own time. If the economic system is disintegrated by rapid
changes, there will be a lack of clear sense of right and wrong relating
to it, and a lack of mechanism for enforcing what sense there is: so
that we need not be surprised if piratical methods in business go
unpunished, and are practised by men otherwise of decent character.
Beyond this an enormous amount of immorality of all kinds, in our time,
may be ascribed to the unsettled condition in which people live. They
become moral stragglers, not kept in line by the discipline of any
intimate group. This applies not only to those whose economic life
shifts from place to place, but also to those who have a stable economic
function, but, like many “travelling men,” lead a shifting,
irresponsible social life.
It is often much the same with men of genius. The very fact that they
have original impulses which they must assert against the indifference
or hostility of the world about them, compels them to a certain moral
isolation, and in hardening themselves against conformity they lose also
the wholesome sense of customary right and wrong. So they live in a kind
of anarchy which may be inseparable from their genius, but is
detrimental to their character, and more or less impairs their work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account