Something of Men I Have Known: With Some Papers of a General Nature, Political, Historical, and RetrospectiveStevenson, Adlai E. (Adlai Ewing)
History
Something of Men I Have Known: With Some Papers of a General Nature, Political, Historical, and Retrospective
Stevenson, Adlai E. (Adlai Ewing)
United States -- Biography; United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933
It is the proud boast of the Briton, that "the British Constitution
has no single date from which its duration is to be reckoned,
and that the origin of English law is as undiscoverable as that of
the Nile." Our Government, buttressed upon a written Constitution
of enumerated and logically implied powers, had its historic
beginning upon that masterful day, April 30, 1789, when Washington
took solemn oath of office as our first President.
The Senate of the United States has been truly declared "the greatest
deliberative body known to men." By Constitutional provision it
consists of two members from each State, chosen by the Legislature
thereof, for the term of six years. No person has the legal
qualification for Senator "unless he shall have attained the age
of thirty years, be an inhabitant of the State for which he is
chosen, and have been nine years a citizen of the United States."
No State, without its consent, can ever be deprived, even by
Constitutional amendment, of its equal representation in the Senate.
Nevada with a population of less than forty thousand has her equal
voice with New York with a population exceeding seven million.
This anomaly was occasioned by concession by the larger to the
smaller States in the Convention of 1787, a concession which
made possible the establishment of the federal Union.
One essential difference between the House of Representatives
and the Senate is that to the latter "the previous question" is
unknown; no method existing for terminating debate, other than
by unanimous consent. Here, unlimited discussion and amendment
can have their perfect work. Within the last three or four decades
many fruitless attempts have been made to introduce a modified
"previous question" or _cloture,_ by which the Senate could be
brought to an immediate vote. At first blush such change might
seem desirable, but experience has demonstrated the wisdom of
the method to which there has been such steady adherence. It
secures time for consideration and full discussion upon every
question. In the end the vote will be taken. Debate is rarely
prolonged beyond reasonable limit. Not infrequently the public
welfare is imperilled by too much, rather than too little, legislation.
It was the belief of Jefferson that government should touch the
citizen at the fewest possible points. The quaint lines of the
old English poet have lost nothing of their significance:
"How small, of all that human hearts endure,
That part which laws or kings can cause or cure!"
The House of Representatives has in large degree ceased to be a
deliberative body. Under the iron rule of the "previous question"
measures of importance are hurriedly passed without the possibility
of discussion or amendment. The rights of the minority are at
times but as the dust in the balance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account