Source Book of London History, from the earliest times to 1800
History
Source Book of London History, from the earliest times to 1800
London (England) -- History
Froissart's description of the Peasants' Revolt is one of our main
sources of information concerning this important event, and seems likely
to be fairly accurate. He himself was, of course, an aristocrat, and was
in no way disposed to be favourable to the "wicked rebels"; but he seems
anxious to represent their case as fairly as possible, although he is
plainly out of sympathy with the ideas and arguments of the rebels. It
is noteworthy that the rising was almost simultaneous in many parts of
the country, but its chief headquarters were in Kent, one of the most
prosperous counties in the kingdom, where actual distress was least
likely to be prevalent; and it is probable that the peasants in this
county had benefited to no small extent by the economic changes which
succeeded the Pestilence of 1349, and had improved both their material
conditions and their intellectual outlook. The ideas of liberty which
formed the motive of the revolt were somewhat vague, but were
strengthened by numerous concrete instances of injustice and injury; and
the concentration of the insurgents upon London forms one of a long
series of indications of the importance of the city as the determining
factor in vital issues.
=Source.=—Froissart's _Chroniques_.
In the mean season there fell in England great mischief and
rebellion of the common people, by which deed England was at a point
to have been lost without recovery....
It was a marvellous thing, and of poor foundation, that this
mischief began in England, and to give ensample to all manner of
people, I will speak thereof as it was done, as I was informed, and
of the incidents thereof. There was an usage in England, and yet is
in divers countries, that the noblemen have great franchises over
the commons, and keep them in servage, that is to say, their tenants
ought by custom to labour their lords' lands, to gather and bring
home their corn, and some to thresh and to fan, and by servage to
make their hay and to hew their wood and bring it home. All these
things they ought to do by servage, and there be more of these
people in England than in any other realm. Thus the noblemen and
prelates are served by them, and specially in the counties of Kent,
Essex, Sussex, and Bedford. These unhappy people of these said
counties began to stir, because they said they were being kept in
great servage, and in the beginning of the world, they said, there
were no bondmen, wherefore they maintained that none ought to be
bond, without he did treason to his lord, as Lucifer did to God....
And of this imagination was a foolish priest in the county of Kent,
called John Ball, for which foolish words he had been three times in
the Bishop of Canterbury's prison: for this priest used oftentimes
on the Sundays, after mass, when the people were going out of the
minster, to go into the cloister and preach, and made the people to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account