BASERUNNERS.|CLUB. |Games.|Stolen Bases. ------------+------------+------+----------- Hoy |Washington | 136 | 82 Seery |Indianapolis| 133 | 80 Sunday |Pittsburg | 119 | 71 Pfeffer |Chicago | 136 | 64 Ryan |Chicago | 130 | 60 Fogarty |Philadelphia| 120 | 58 Kelly |Boston | 105 | 56 Ewing |New York | 103 | 53 Tiernan |New York | 113 | 52 The above are the leaders in seven of the eight League clubs. Hanlon led in the Detroit team, but he only scored 38 stolen bases in 108 games. The Detroit team was singularly weak in this respect. Mr. R.M. Larner of Washington has made up an interesting table from the figures of the League averages, which presents some very interesting statistics of the base running in the League during the championship season of 1888. Mr. Larner says: "The official averages of League players contain the number of bases stolen by each player during the season, but furnish no means of comparison between the clubs in that most important department of the game. A glance, however, shows that the three tail-end clubs possess the three most successful base-runners in the League, in Hoy of the Washingtons, Seery of Indianapolis, and Sunday of Pittsburgh, the latter of whom would probably have finished first had an accident not prevented him from playing during the last two weeks of the season." The following table includes in its first column all those methods of reaching first base, except the force-outs, which cannot be ascertained, and would not materially affect the record, in this comparison. Indianapolis and Washington still lead, Pittsburgh comes well to the front, pushing the next three clubs down a peg each, and the Phillies and Detroits keep their places at the foot: CLUBS. |Reached 1st Base.|Stolen Bases.|Percentages. ------------+-----------------+-------------+----------- Indianapolis| 1,589 | 350 | .220 Washington | 1,515 | 331 | .218 Pittsburg | 1,474 | 282 | .191 New York | 1,772 | 315 | .178 Boston | 1,719 | 292 | .170 Chicago | 1,720 | 285 | .166 Philadelphia| 1,569 | 246 | .157 Detroit | 1,843 | 193 | .105 Mr. Larner says. "The simple total of bases stolen is misleading as to a club's proficiency in base running, since the strong batting clubs having more men who reach first base have more chances to steal, and hence excel in totals, while in percentages they fall below clubs which are weaker in batting. The true measure is the relation between the number of bases stolen and the number of chances offered for the attempt, which is the whole number of those who reach first base, whether on hits, balls, errors, hits by pitcher, illegal delivery, or force-outs." THE CLUB RECORD OF STOLEN BASES.