Studies in Classic American LiteratureLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
History
Studies in Classic American Literature
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
American literature -- History and criticism
And again, that "voluptuous, oriental" characteristic that knows the
mystery of the ithyphallic gods. She would not betray the ithyphallic
gods to this white, leprous-white society of "lovers." Neither will I,
if I can help it. These leprous-white, seducing, spiritual women, who
"understand" so much. One has been too often seduced, and "understood. I
can read him like a book," said my first lover of me. The book is in
several volumes, dear. And more and more comes back to me the gulf of
dark hate and _other_ understanding, in the eyes of the gypsy woman. So
different from the hateful white light of understanding which floats
like scum on the eyes of white, oh, so white English and American women,
with their understanding voices and their deep, sad words, and their
profound, _good_ spirits. Pfui!
Hester was scared only of one result of her sin: Pearl. Pearl, the
scarlet letter incarnate. The little girl. When women bear children,
they produce either devils or sons with gods in them. And it is an
evolutionary process. The devil in Hester produced a purer devil in
Pearl. And the devil in Pearl will produce--she married an Italian
Count--a piece of purer devilishness still.
And so from hour to hour we ripe and ripe.
And then from hour to hour we rot and rot.
There was that in the child "which often impelled Hester to ask in
bitterness of heart, whether it were for good or ill that the poor
little creature had been born at all."
For ill, Hester. But don't worry. Ill is as necessary as good.
Malevolence is as necessary as benevolence. If you have brought forth,
spawned, a young malevolence, be sure there is a rampant falseness in
the world against which this malevolence must be turned. Falseness has
to be bitten and bitten, till it is bitten to death. Hence Pearl.
Pearl. Her own mother compares her to the demon of plague, or scarlet
fever, in her red dress. But then plague is necessary to destroy a
rotten, false humanity.
Pearl, the devilish girl-child, who can be so tender and loving and
_understanding_, and then, when she has understood, will give you a hit
across the mouth, and turn on you with a grin of sheer diabolic jeering.
Serves you right, you shouldn't be _understood._ That is your vice. You
shouldn't want to be loved, and then you'd not get hit across the mouth.
Pearl will love you: marvellously. And she'll hit you across the mouth:
oh, so neatly. And serves you right.
Pearl is perhaps the most modern child in all literature.
Old-fashioned Nathaniel, with his little-boy charm, he'll tell you
what's what. But he'll cover it with smarm.
Hester simply _hates_ her child, from one part of herself. And from
another, she cherishes her child as her one precious treasure. For Pearl
is the continuing of her female revenge on life. But female revenge hits
both ways. Hits back at its own mother. The female revenge in Pearl hits
back at Hester, the mother, and Hester is simply livid with fury and
"sadness," which is rather amusing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account