Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely considered — John Shaqi
Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely consideredHazlitt, William Carew
History
Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely considered
Hazlitt, William Carew
Wit and humor -- History and criticism
The affinity between these is unmistakable. The same train of thought
may produce the same fruit with an absolute freedom from indebtedness.
It is a rather interesting problem, of which the solution will,
perhaps, never be forthcoming. A second illustration is admissible,
shewing the same process at work at a different angle:--
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. NINETEENTH CENTURY.
“Sheridan told his “When Sydney
son that he thought Smith’s physician
it was high time for (Abernethy) told him
him to take a wife. that he ought to take
‘_Whose_ wife shall I exercise on an empty
take, sir?’ was the stomach, he inquired,
inquiry.” ‘upon whose?’”[1]
[1] There can be no doubt that the faulty or varying versions of
stories of modern origin are often ascribable to the neglect of
immediate registration, and the subsequent oral or written repetition
from memory.
It is not in the least degree a ground for astonishment, that _jeux
d’esprit_ appertaining to old times have descended to our own in a
decomposed or mutilated condition, when we find such fugitive trifles
connected with men, who were all but our contemporaries, already
parting with the bloom of the mint. Two of the biographers of Charles
Lamb offer to public consideration simultaneously a _mot_ from his
lips, in terms beginning to be fairly devious, but which, when a
few more years have run out, will by possibility have ceased to be
recognisable by the author. _Ecce!_
“MR. PROCTER. “MR. FITZGERALD.
“An old lady, fond of “A lady once bored
her dissenting minister, him a good deal. ‘Such
wearied Lamb by the a charming man! I know
length of his praises. ‘I him! Bless him! I know
speak, because I _know_ him!’ To her Charles, wearied
him well,’ said she. with repetition of this
‘Well, I don’t,’ replied encomium,--‘Well, I
Lamb, ‘I don’t; but don’t; but _damn him
damn him at a venture.’” at a hazard_.’”
The two records are approximately similar; yet the discrepancies are
rather serious, taking into calculation the nearness of Lamb to us and
to the literary gentlemen who have made it their business to chronicle
his good sayings. The editorial setting has somewhat overlaid the
mounted jewel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account