Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely consideredHazlitt, William Carew
History
Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely considered
Hazlitt, William Carew
Wit and humor -- History and criticism
None of our Shakespearian students has hitherto addressed himself to
the special task of tracing to, their sources the few pieces of gossip
about the poet, save, perhaps, the deer-stealing episode. The _Richard
III. and William the Conqueror_ story, in which Burbage and Shakespear
are made to figure, is recorded by Manningham in his Elizabethan
Diary, and no earlier analogue has fallen in my way. The scandal about
Davenant is another item of the same class, which we are almost ashamed
to find ourselves cherishing, even though it be, as it were, _formâ
pauperis_, from sheer lack of better matter. It seems lamentable that,
while the anecdote-hunter was on the trail, he did not appropriate, for
the benefit, instruction and delight of every intelligent individual
coming after him, some particulars of Shakespear’s private and literary
life, once so easy of access, now so irretrievably lost! How many
thousand biographies of all kinds of nonentities might not be exchanged
for an account of Shakespear by an educated contemporary!
Malone refers to the foundation of the Literary Club and to a little
episode about Garrick and Johnson in connection with that event:--
“Not very long after the institution of the Club,” he says, “Sir J.
Reynolds was speaking of it to Garrick. ‘I like it much,’ says he;
‘I think I’ll be of you.’ When Sir J. Reynolds mentioned this to Dr.
Johnson, he was much displeased at the actor’s conceit. ‘He’ll be of
us!’ says Johnson; ‘how does he know we will permit him? The first
duke in England has no right to hold such language.’ However, when
Garrick was regularly proposed, some time afterwards, Johnson warmly
supported him....”
“On the former part of this story,” adds Malone, “it probably was
that Sir John Hawkins grounded his account that Garrick never was of
the Literary Club, and that Johnson said he never ought to be of it.
And thus it is that this stupid biographer, and the more flippant
and malicious Mrs. Piozzi, have miscoloured and misrepresented every
anecdote that they have pretended to tell of Dr. Johnson.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account