Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing themPasteur, Louis
Science
Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing them
Pasteur, Louis
Beer; Fermentation
Nearly the same results were obtained in the case of urine; it underwent
no radical change; its colour merely assumed a reddish brown tint; it
formed some small deposits of crystals, but without becoming at all
turbid or putrefying in any way. The direct oxidation of the urinary
substances was likewise very sluggish. An analysis of the air in one of
the flasks, made forty days after the commencement of the experiment,
gave the following results:—
Oxygen 19·2
Carbonic acid 0·8
Nitrogen 80·0
——-
100·0
These experiments on blood and urine which we have just mentioned date
from 1863.[30] Ten years afterwards, in 1873, they were confirmed in an
important and striking manner by the results of a very able series of
experiments, which were carried out in our laboratory, by M. Gayon, who
was formerly a pupil in the _École Normale Supérieure_. M. Gayon proved
that what held good in the case of blood and urine, also held good in
the case of the substances contained in eggs. He found that the whites
of eggs might be exposed for any length of time to contact with air, as
also might the yolks, or the white and yolks mixed, without any
putrefactive change or fermentation resulting, and without the smallest
microscopic germ showing itself, the sole condition being that the air
must be freed from all organic particles of dust, germs of mould,
_bacteria_, _vibrios_, and other organisms which it holds in suspension.
This was only a part of the important facts brought to light by M.
Gayon. Amongst other things, he proved that spontaneous putrefaction in
eggs is invariably caused by the development of organized ferments,
thereby correcting the opposite statements announced by M. Donné and M.
Béchamp, who were led by their observations to believe that the change
in eggs took place quite independently of the action of _vibrios_ and
_mucedines_.[31]
It is almost superfluous to remark how greatly the results of these
experiments on blood, urine, and the components of the egg are opposed
to the doctrine of spontaneous generation, as also to most modern
theories on the generation of ferments. As long as experiments relating
to the question of so-called _spontaneous_ generation were made on
heated substances, the advocates of _heterogenesis_ had some grounds for
asserting that such materials could not satisfy the conditions of
spontaneous life, and that we should obtain different results by using
natural organic liquids, which, if exposed to contact of pure air would
doubtless serve for the production of new beings which did not issue
from parents which resembled them. This novel enunciation of the
hypothesis of spontaneous generation, the only one, we think, that could
be defended after the publication of our Memoir, in 1862, is condemned
by the preceding facts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account