Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
The original text, adopted by the _T‘u Shu_, has 出其所不趨; it has
been altered to suit the context and the commentaries of Ts‘ao
Kung and Ho Shih, who evidently read 必趨. The other reading would
mean: “Appear at points to which the enemy cannot hasten;” but in
this case there is something awkward in the use of 趨. Capt.
Calthrop is wrong of course with “appearing where the enemy is not.”
6. 行千里而不勞者行於無人之地也
An army may march great distances without distress, if it marches
through country where the enemy is not.
We must beware of understanding 無人之地 as “uninhabited country.”
Sun Tzŭ habitually uses 人 in the sense of 敵, e.g. _supra_, § 2.
Ts‘ao Kung sums up very well: 出空擊虛避其所守擊其不意 “Emerge from
the void [_q.d._ like “a bolt from the blue”], strike at
vulnerable points, shun places that are defended, attack in
unexpected quarters.” The difference of meaning between 空 and 虛
is worth noting.
7. 攻而必取者攻其所不守也守而必固者守其所不攻也
You can be sure of succeeding in your attacks if you only attack
places which are undefended.
所不守 is of course hyperbolical; Wang Hsi rightly explains it as “weak
points; that is to say, where the general is lacking in capacity, or
the soldiers in spirit; where the walls are not strong enough, or the
precautions not strict enough; where relief comes too late, or
provisions are too scanty, or the defenders are variance amongst
themselves.”
You can ensure the safety of your defence if you only hold positions
that cannot be attacked.
_I.e._, where there are none of the weak points mentioned above. There
is rather a nice point involved in the interpretation of this latter
clause. Tu Mu, Ch‘ên Hao, and Mei Yao-ch‘ên assume the meaning to be:
“In order to make your defence quite safe, you must defend _even_
those places that are not likely to be attacked;” and Tu Mu adds: “How
much more, then, those that will be attacked.” Taken thus, however,
the clause balances less well with the preceding—always a
consideration in the highly antithetical style which is natural to the
Chinese. Chang Yü, therefore, seems to come nearer the mark in saying:
“He who is skilled in attack flashes forth from the topmost heights of
heaven [see IV. § 7], making it impossible for the enemy to guard
against him. This being so, the places that I shall attack are
precisely those that the enemy cannot defend.... He who is skilled in
defence hides in the most secret recesses of the earth, making it
impossible for the enemy to estimate his whereabouts. This being so,
the places that I shall hold are precisely those that the enemy cannot
attack.”
8. 故善攻者敵不知其所守善守者敵不知其所攻
Hence that general is skilful in attack whose opponent does not know
what to defend; and he is skilful in defence whose opponent does not
know what to attack.
An aphorism which puts the whole art of war into a nutshell.
9. 微乎微乎至於無形神乎神乎至於無聲故能爲敵之司命
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account