Surrey: Painted by Sutton Palmer; Described by A.R. Hope MoncrieffMoncrieff, A. R. Hope (Ascott Robert Hope)
History
Surrey: Painted by Sutton Palmer; Described by A.R. Hope Moncrieff
Moncrieff, A. R. Hope (Ascott Robert Hope)
Surrey (England) -- Description and travel
Over flat meadows, the river goes out to the north, bending round the
suburb of Stoke Park, then takes its course by a series of locks,
bridges, and mills that make goals for boating parties. The first name
of fame it reaches, some three straight miles from the town, is Sutton
Place, standing back in its park that stretches down to the left bank.
Loseley, above Guildford, is Sutton's only rival as at once the
stateliest and loveliest mansion in Surrey, taking a high place among
the lordly halls of England. In the Reformation days, when donjon keeps
could give place to orieled and gabled mansions, this was built by Sir
Richard Weston, ancestor and namesake of the Wey's canaliser. A peculiar
feature is the use made of terra-cotta, on which, as on the windows of
the Hall, is repeated the builder's _rebus_, a bunch of grapes and a
tun. It need hardly be said that such a house is rich in relics of the
past. But indeed one cannot here speak worthily of what has had a whole
sumptuous quarto devoted to it by Mr. Frederic Harrison,
[Illustration: PYRFORD CHURCH, NEAR WOKING.]
who may well call it a landmark of English architecture, one of the
earliest great houses not built with a design of defence.
The house is almost contemporary with some of those exquisite
châteaux of the age of Francis which are still preserved on the
Loire. Like them, it possesses Italian features of a fancy and
grace as remote from the Gothic as from the classical world. Like
them, as was every fine work of that age, it is the embodiment of a
single idea, of a personal sense of beauty of some creative genius;
and thus it stands apart in the history of house-building in
Europe, a cinque-cento conception in an English Gothic frame....
The house, too, has had the singular fortune to retain, at least on
the outside, its original form, and to be quite free from later
additions. Save that one side of the court has been removed, the
principal quadrangle, as seen from within, is in every essential
feature exactly as the builder left it. Nor, except by the removal
or the renewal of some mullions, has the exterior on any side
suffered any material change. It is not, like so many of our
ancient mansions, a record of the caprice, the ambition, the decay
or the bad taste, of successive generations. No Elizabethan
architect has added a classical porch; no Jacobean magnate has
thrown out a ponderous wing with fantastic gables and profusion of
scrolls; no Georgian squire has turned it into a miniature
Blenheim, or consulted his comfort by adding a square barrack....
This unity and peace, which seem to rest on the old house almost as
on a ruin or a cloister whence modern improvements are shut out,
are doubtless due to this: that from its building till to-day the
place has remained in the same family, and that a family debarred
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account