Sweated industry and the minimum wageBlack, Clementina
History
Sweated industry and the minimum wage
Black, Clementina
Minimum wage; Sweatshops
The preceding chapters do not profess to give anything like a general
survey of the whole field of British labour. It has seemed wise for many
reasons to confine myself to aspects with which I am, in a greater or
less degree, personally familiar; and therefore the work of women, and
of London women especially, looms rather large. But I hope that I have
shown, by a sufficient range of instances, certain general truths. In
trade after trade, men, women and children are exhibited working in the
conditions which are indicated, comprehensively but vaguely, by the term
“sweating.” We have seen the dwelling of the home worker robbed of every
feature that makes a home, its narrow space littered with match boxes,
or with shirts or trousers or paper-bags—in any case transformed into
one of the most comfortless of workshops. In some homes the rattle of
the sewing machine forms a ceaseless accompaniment to the whole course
of family life; in others, meals, such as they are, are eaten in the
immediate neighbourhood of the glue pot or the paste pot; the smell of
new cloth, the dust and fluff of flannelette pervade the room of the
“finisher”; damp paper-bags or damp cardboard boxes lie piled on beds;
home, parents and children are all subservient to unintermittent and
most unremunerative labour.
One step, but only one step, higher comes the factory “hand.” We have
seen girls filling pots with boiling jam, carrying to and fro heavy
trays and stacking these trays in piles, two together raising, sometimes
to above the height of their own heads, trays some of which weigh well
over half a hundredweight. We have seen them, even when their work was
not in itself heavy, worn out by the rapidity with which they repeat
endlessly, day after day, and week after week, operations of mechanical
monotony. Some glimpse has been given of those horrible intervals in
which the semistarvation of “full work” gives place to the acute
privation of “slack time.” The dangers, discomforts, hardships and
exactions that must be borne if an employer chooses to inflict them,
have been indicated, though but very inadequately; and the example of
laundries and jam factories has served to suggest how far worse yet
would be the conditions of factory operatives if the law did not
intervene for their protection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account