xm_{0} + y_{1}m_{0} x_{1}m_{0} + y_{1}m_{0}
·---------------· ·---------------·
| | | | (I) |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| |(O)|(O)| | | |(O)|(O)| |
|(I)|---|---|---| |(I)|---|---|---|
| |(O)| | | | |(O)| | |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| | | | | |
·---------------· ·---------------·
pg083
(2) _Fallacy of Unlike Eliminands with an Entity-Premiss._
Here the given Pair may be represented by (xm_{0} + ym'_{1}) with or
without x_{1} or m_{1}.
These, set out on Triliteral Diagrams, are
xm_{0} + ym'_{1} x_{1}m_{0} + ym'_{1} m_{1}x_{0} + ym'_{1}
·---------------· ·---------------· ·---------------·
| | | | (I) | | | |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| |(O)|(O)| | | |(O)|(O)| | | |(O)|(O)| |
|(I)|---|---|---| |(I)|---|---|---| |(I)|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (I) | |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| | | | | | | | |
·---------------· ·---------------· ·---------------·
(3) _Fallacy of two Entity-Premisses._
Here the given Pair may be represented by either (xm_{1} + ym_{1}) or
(xm_{1} + ym'_{1}).
These, set out on Triliteral Diagrams, are
xm_{1} + ym_{1} xm_{1} + ym'_{1}
·---------------· ·---------------·
| | | | | |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| | (I) | | | | (I) | |
|---|(I)|---|---| |(I)|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | |
| ·---|---· | | ·---|---· |
| | | | | |
·---------------· ·---------------·
pg084
§ 4.
_Method of proceeding with a given Pair of Propositions._
Let us suppose that we have before us a Pair of Propositions of
Relation, which contain between them a Pair of codivisional Classes, and
that we wish to ascertain what Conclusion, if any, is consequent from
them. We translate them, if necessary, into subscript-form, and then
proceed as follows:--
(1) We examine their Subscripts, in order to see whether they are
(a) a Pair of Nullities;
or (b) a Nullity and an Entity;
or (c) a Pair of Entities.
(2) If they are a Pair of Nullities, we examine their Eliminands, in
order to see whether they are Unlike or Like.
If their Eliminands are _Unlike_, it is a case of Fig. I. We then
examine their Retinends, to see whether one or both of them are asserted
to _exist_. If one Retinend is so asserted, it is a case of Fig. I (a);
if both, it is a case of Fig. I (b).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account