Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Martineau, Types, 2:151—“What meaning could Pity have in a world
where suffering was not meant to be?” Hicks, Critique of Design
Arguments, 386—“The very badness of the world convinces us that
God is good.” And Sir Henry Taylor’s words: “Pain in man Bears the
high mission of the flail and fan; In brutes ’tis surely
piteous”—receive their answer: The brute is but an appendage to
man, and like inanimate nature it suffers from man’s fall—suffers
not wholly in vain, for even pain in brutes serves to illustrate
the malign influence of sin and to suggest motives for resisting
it. Pascal: “Whatever virtue can be bought with pain is cheaply
bought.” The pain and imperfection of the world are God’s frown
upon sin and his warning against it. See Bushnell, chapter on
Anticipative Consequences, in Nature and the Supernatural,
194-219. Also McCosh, Divine Government, 26-35, 249-261; Farrar,
Science and Theology, 82-105; Johnson, in Bap. Rev., 6:141-154;
Fairbairn, Philos. Christ. Religion, 94-168.
2. To the wisdom and free-will of God.
No plan whatever of a finite creation can fully express the infinite
perfection of God. Since God, however, is immutable, he must always have
had a plan of the universe; since he is perfect, he must have had the best
possible plan. As wise, God cannot choose a plan less good, instead of one
more good. As rational, he cannot between plans equally good make a merely
arbitrary choice. Here is no necessity, but only the certainty that
infinite wisdom will act wisely. As no compulsion from without, so no
necessity from within, moves God to create the actual universe. Creation
is both wise and free.
As God is both rational and wise, his having a plan of the
universe must be better than his not having a plan would be. But
the universe once was not; yet without a universe God was blessed
and sufficient to himself. God’s perfection therefore requires,
not that he have a universe, but that he have a plan of the
universe. Again, since God is both rational and wise, his actual
creation cannot be the worst possible, nor one arbitrarily chosen
from two or more equally good. It must be, all things considered,
the best possible. We are optimists rather than pessimists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account