Communism -- Soviet Union; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
“The words of the Minister-President, who allowed himself to speak of
‘populace’ when it is question of the movement of important sections of
the proletariat and the army—although led in the wrong direction—are
nothing but an incitement to civil war.”
The order of the day proposed by the Left was voted. It amounted
practically to a vote of lack of confidence.
1. The armed demonstration which has been preparing for some days past
has for its object a _coup d’etat,_ threatens to provoke civil war,
creates conditions favourable to _pogroms_ and counterrevolution, the
mobilization of counter-revolutionary forces, such as the Black
Hundreds, which will inevitably bring about the impossibility of
convoking the Constituent, will cause a military catastrophe, the death
of the Revolution, paralyse the economic life of the country and
destroy Russia;
2. The conditions favourable to this agitation have been created by
delay in passing urgent measures, as well as objective conditions
caused by the war and the general disorder. It is necessary before
everything to promulgate at once a decree transmitting the land to the
peasants’ Land Committees, and to adopt an energetic course of action
abroad in proposing to the Allies to proclaim their peace terms and to
begin peace-parleys;
3. To cope with Monarchist manifestations and _pogromist_ movements, it
is indispensable to take immediate measures to suppress these
movements, and for this purpose to create at Petrograd a Committee of
Public Safety, composed of representatives of the Municipality and the
organs of the revolutionary democracy, acting in contact with the
Provisional Government….
It is interesting to note that the Mensheviki and Socialist
Revolutionaries all rallied to this resolution…. When Kerensky saw it,
however, he summoned Avksentiev to the Winter Palace to explain. If it
expressed a lack of confidence in the Provisional Government, he begged
Avksentiev to form a new Cabinet. Dan, Gotz and Avksentiev, the leaders
of the “compromisers,” performed their last compromise…. They explained
to Kerensky that it was not meant as a criticism of the Government!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account