“C’est cette sensation du danger présent que j’aurais voulu donner dans
_La Barricade_ sûr, si j’avais pu y réussir, d’avoir servi utilement ma
classe, et par conséquent mon pays.”
But according to M. Pataud, the notorious ex-Secretary of the Syndicate
of Electricians, M. Bourget carried away with him a totally false
impression of the men and places he professes so closely, and also so
impartially, to have studied.
A word about M. Pataud. It was shortly after he had ordered the
Electricians’ strike that plunged Paris almost into darkness for two
hours,[2] and at the zenith of his fame, that the “Roi de la Lumière”
attended a performance of _La Barricade_ at the Vaudeville Theatre.
It had been reported that he had served M. Bourget as a model for the
character of Thubeuf, the professional agitator in the play. This, M.
Bourget emphatically denied. “Let me see for myself,” said M. Pataud. And
he requested M. Bourget to send him a ticket of admission to the theatre,
and humorously offered to return the compliment by placing a seat in the
Bourse du Travail at the dramatist’s disposal.
Well, M. Bourget granted the request: but ignored the invitation to the
Labour Exchange. And one night “King Pataud” seated himself, amidst
_le Tout Paris_ in the most fashionable of the boulevard theatres. He
himself, in spite of his pink shirt, red tie, and “bowler” hat, belonged
in a sense to _le Tout Paris_. Was he not “Le Roi de la Lumière”? There
were columns about him in the newspapers; he was “impersonated” in every
music-hall _revue_, and his picture post cards sold by the thousand.
Then, pressing (and sentimental) requests for his autograph; invitations
out to dinner and gifts of cigarettes and cigars; and what a stir, what
excited cries of “There goes Pataud,” when the great man swaggered down
the boulevards with a fine Havana stuck in a corner of his mouth, and the
“bowler” hat tilted rakishly over the right eye!
Nor in the Vaudeville Theatre was his triumph less complete. The interest
of the brilliant audience was centred on “Fauteuil No. 159”; not on the
stage. There sat the man who had but to give the signal and—out would
go the lights! So was every opera-glass levelled at him, and so—at the
end of the performance—were all the reporters in Paris eager to obtain
“King” Pataud’s impressions of the play. “Not bad,” he was reported to
have said. “But M. Bourget’s conception of how strikes are conducted is
ridiculous. And his strikers are equally absurd.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account