The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
Dreiser’s patriotism is not blind. The future of his country fills him
with worry and anxiety. Looking forward as a philosopher, he looks upon
American civilization as upon a brilliant phase, though not a final
one, in the world’s evolution. Bossuet, in his discourse on universal
history, viewed nations and empires as many toys in the hands of a
divine Providence. Dreiser considers them as the playthings of Chance.
A faithful believer in the law of change, he has little illusion left
on the subject of the rights of men, brotherhood, freedom. Life is a
dream, and this great American Commonwealth, whose achievements fill
him with pride and enthusiasm, may well be also another dream:
Happy, happy people! Yet for the dream’s sake, as I told myself
at this time, and as against an illimitable background of natural
chance and craft, I would like to see this and the other sections
with which it is so closely allied, this vast Republic, live on.
It is so splendid, so tireless. Its people, in spite of their
defects and limitations, sing so at their tasks. There are dark
places, but there are splendid points of light, too. One is their
innocence, complete and enduring; another is their faith in ideals
and the Republic. A third is their optimism and buoyancy of soul,
their courage to get up in the morning and go up and down the
world, whistling and singing. Oh, the whistling, singing American,
with his jest and his sound heart and that light of humorous
apprehension in his eyes! How wonderful it all is! It isn’t
English, or French, or German, or Spanish, or Russian, or Swedish,
or Greek. It’s American, “Good Old United States,”--and for that
reason I liked this region and all these other portions of America
that I have ever seen. New England is not so kindly, the South not
so hopeful, the Far West more so, but they have something of these
characteristics which I have been describing.
And for these reasons I would have this tremendous, bubbling
Republic live on, as a protest perhaps against the apparently too
unbreakable rule that democracy, equality, or the illusion of it,
is destined to end in disaster. It cannot survive ultimately, I
think. In the vast, universal sea of motion, where change and decay
are laws, and individual power is almost always uppermost, it must
go under--but until then--
We are all such pathetic victims of chance, anyhow. We are born,
we struggle, we plan, and chance blows all our dreams away. If,
therefore, one country, one State dares to dream the impossible,
why cast it down before its ultimate hour? Why not dream with it?
It is so gloriously, so truly a poetic land. We were conceived in
ecstasy and born in dreams.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account