The Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, Volume 1 (of 2)Geikie, Archibald
History
The Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, Volume 1 (of 2)
Geikie, Archibald
Volcanoes -- Great Britain
Now and then, by the explosions from a volcano at the present day, a
single stone may be ejected at such an angle and with such force as to
fall to the ground at a long distance from the vent. In like manner,
among the volcanic records of former periods, we may occasionally
come upon a single block of lava imbedded among tuffs or even in
non-volcanic strata. Where such a stone has fallen upon soft sediment,
it can be seen to have sunk into it, pressing down the layers beneath
it, and having the subsequently deposited layers heaped over it. An
ejected block of this nature is represented among the tuffs shown in
Fig. 13. Another instance from a group of non-volcanic sediments is
given in Fig. 15, and is selected from a number of illustrations of
this interesting feature which have been observed among the Lower
Carboniferous formations of the basin of the Firth of Forth. A solitary
block, imbedded in a series of strata, would not, of course, by itself
afford a demonstration of volcanic activity. There are various ways
in which such stones may be transported and dropped over a muddy
water-bottom. They may, for example, be floated off attached to
sea-weeds, or wrapped round by the roots of trees. But where a block
of basalt or other volcanic rock has obviously descended with such
force as to crush down the deposits on which it fell, and when lavas
and tuffs are known to exist in the vicinity, there can be little
hesitation in regarding such a block as having been ejected from a
neighbouring vent, either during an explosion of exceptional violence
or with an unusually low angle of projection.
[Illustration: Fig. 15.--Ejected block of Basalt which has fallen among
Carboniferous shales and limestones, shore, Pettycur, Fife.]
In conclusion, reference may conveniently be made here to another
variety of fragmental volcanic materials which cannot always be
satisfactorily distinguished from true tuffs, although arising from a
thoroughly non-volcanic agency. Where a mass of lava has been exposed
to denudation, as, for instance, when a volcanic island has been
formed in a lake or in the sea, the detritus worn away from it may be
spread out like any other kind of sediment. Though derived from the
degradation of lava, such a mechanical deposit is not properly a tuff,
nor can it even be included among strictly volcanic formations. It may
be called a volcanic conglomerate, rhyolitic conglomerate, diabase
sandstone, felsitic shale, or by any other name that will adequately
denote its composition and texture. But it may not afford proof of
strictly contemporaneous volcanic activity. All that we are entitled
to infer from such a deposit is that, at the time when it was laid
down, volcanic rocks of a certain kind were exposed at the surface and
were undergoing degradation. But the date of their original eruption
may have been long previous to that of the formation of the detrital
deposit from their waste.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account