The apiary; or, bees, bee-hives, and bee culture [1878]: being a familiar account of the habits of bees, and the most improved methods of managementNeighbor, Alfred
Science
The apiary; or, bees, bee-hives, and bee culture [1878]: being a familiar account of the habits of bees, and the most improved methods of management
The fertilisation of the queen and the determination of the sexes of
her progeny are two subjects of so much interest that we must make room
for some exposition of the discoveries of the past thirty years in
relation thereto. What has been already stated on the former of these
under the section on "The Drone" consists of facts which were mainly
established by Huber; but within the present generation the great
German apiarians have returned to the question, and Dzierzon has set
forth some most marvellous deductions, which Baron von Berlepsch has
followed up with amplification and further proof. It was found that
the queen while in a virgin condition was often capable of depositing
eggs, and that these eggs, unlike those of poultry laid under somewhat
similar conditions, would hatch equally with others, but they _all
produced drones_. From this arose the question. Whence come the
drones _after_ the queen has been fertilised? A fact known from the
days of Huber and Riem was by some supposed to settle the difficulty.
In many hives there exist what are called "fertile workers"--bees
having the female organs sufficiently developed to deposit eggs, but
not sufficiently so to receive fecundation; and as it was found that
the eggs of these fulfilled the conditions required, and invariably
produced drone bees, the theory was erected that these fertile workers
were the regular producers of that sex. But this plausible solution
of the problem did not stand examination. Every fertile queen does
habitually lay eggs in drone cells, and from those eggs drones are
uniformly developed. Dissection and microscopic analysis had therefore
to be resorted to, and the course of investigation commenced by
Swammerdam and pursued by Mlle. Jurine was now pushed to a much further
extent.
Proceeding from the two ovaries of the queen there are two canals,
called oviducts, which presently unite, and immediately beyond their
point of juncture is a small globular receptacle which is called the
spermatheca. With fertile queens it was found that this appendage is
permanently occupied by a fluid identical with that in the reproductive
organs of the drones, and that as such it abounds in spermatozoa; while
with a virgin queen the fluid is totally destitute of these, and is
wholly different in appearance, being thin and transparent. From this
discovery the conclusion followed that each egg, as it passes down
the oviduct and over the mouth of the spermatheca, may either receive
fecundation or not, according as the queen's own will or some other
circumstance shall determine. Dzierzon accordingly propounded as the
apparent, though still only hypothetical, solution of the enigma, what
is known as the doctrine of parthenogenesis or virgin breeding--the
law that life is imparted by the mother independently, and that every
egg as originally developed in her ovaries is of the male sex, but that
whenever fertilised with the male fluid it becomes transformed into a
female!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account