The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
Imperial edicts of toleration, and promises of reform on the part of the
Sublime Porte, have been very numerous, and have served Turkey well as
political expedients. Their value is that of so much dust thrown in the
eyes of Europe when her aid or her mercy was needful. As these reforms
have all been promised under pressure, they have likewise been abandoned
just so fast and so far as the pressure has been removed. In many cases
there has been serious retrogression. The sow that is washed is forever
returning to wallow in the mire. It is as true of the “Sick Man” as of
him out of whom seven devils were cast, that the last state of that man
is worse than the first. This is emphatically so in regard to the
freedom of the press, the curtailment of religious and educational
privileges, and the safety of the lives and property of Christians.
The following is a partial list of Turkish promises which have been
broken in whole or in part, with the circumstances under which they were
made.
1. In 1829, by the Treaty of Adrianople at the close of a war with
Russia, Turkey promised to reform in her treatment of Orthodox
Christians, and acknowledged Russia’s right to interfere in their
behalf.[15]
2. In 1839 Sultan Abd-ul-Medjid, in order to enlist European sympathy
and aid—when the victorious Egyptian army under Ibrahim Pasha was
threatening Constantinople—issued an Imperial rescript, the Hatti
Sherif, in which he promised to protect the life, honor, and property of
all his subjects irrespective of race or religion.
3. In 1844 the same Sultan Abd-ul-Medjid gave a solemn pledge that
thenceforth no apostate from Mohammedanism _who had formerly been a
Christian_ should be put to death. This pledge was extorted from the
Sultan by the Ambassador of Great Britain, supported by those of other
Powers, after the public execution in Constantinople of a young
Armenian, Ovagim, who had declared himself a Mohammedan, but who
afterwards bravely maintained his Christian profession in the face of
torture and death. Since that time many Moslems even have embraced
Christianity, and have been put out of the way, quietly in most cases.
4. In 1850 the same Sultan, on the demand of the same Powers, in view of
the continued and fierce persecution of the Protestant subjects of the
Porte, granted the latter a charter, guaranteeing them liberty of
conscience and all the rights as a distinct civil community, which had
been enjoyed by the other Christian communities of the empire. But to
this day the numerous Protestants of Stamboul have never been allowed to
erect even _one church_, although they have owned a site and had the
necessary funds, and been petitioning for a firman to build for fifteen
years.[16] The Greek Protestants of Ordoo, who have a church, are not
allowed to worship in it. There are many other flagrant violations of
this charter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account