The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
5. In 1856, after the Crimean War, Sultan Abd-ul-Medjid, to anticipate
demands which he knew would be included in the Treaty of Paris then
being drawn up, issued the Imperial edict known as the Hatti Humayoun.
This edict not only promised perfect equality of civil rights to all
subjects of the Porte, but also added: “As all forms of religion are and
shall be freely professed in my dominions, no subject of my empire shall
be hindered in the exercise of the religion that he professes, nor shall
he in any way be annoyed on this account.” But as the interpretation and
enforcement of this edict has remained absolutely in the hands of the
Turkish Government, it is needless to add that it has been a dead
letter.[17]
6. In 1878 the Anglo-Turkish Convention, entered into just before the
Treaty of Berlin, included these words in its First Article: “His
Imperial Majesty, the Sultan, promises to England to introduce necessary
reforms, to be agreed upon later between the two Powers, into the
government and for the protection of the Christian and other subjects of
the Porte in these territories [Armenia]; and in order to enable England
to make necessary provision for executing her engagement [the keeping of
Russia out of Armenia], His Imperial Majesty, the Sultan, further
consents to assign the Island of Cyprus to be occupied and administered
by England.” Comment unnecessary.
7. In July, 1878, by the Treaty of Berlin, religious liberty and the
public exercise of all forms of religion were guaranteed in separate
articles to the people of Bulgaria, Eastern Roumelia, Montenegro,
Servia, Roumania, and finally to all subjects of the Porte in every part
of the Ottoman Empire. Cases of glaring violation of the principle of
religious liberty may be found in Appendix C. on _The Censorship of the
Press_.
The Sixty-first Article of the same treaty reads thus: “The Sublime
Porte undertakes to carry out, without further delay, the improvements
and reforms demanded by local requirements in the provinces inhabited by
the Armenians, and to guarantee their security against the Circassians
and Kurds. It will periodically make known the steps taken to this
effect to the Powers, who will superintend their application.”
What the condition of Turkey was three years later, not simply in
Armenia, but throughout Asia Minor, is shown by a report of Mr. Wilson,
British Consul-General in Anatolia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account