The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
CHAPTER V.
THE OUTCOME OF THE TREATY OF BERLIN.
It is quite needless to remark that Turkey, instead of doing anything to
improve the condition of the Armenians, has done much to make it worse
during the past fifteen years. The question now arises, what have the
Powers signatory to the Berlin Treaty done to compel the Sublime Porte
“to carry out the improvements and reforms” demanded in the Sixty-first
Article? And what steps has Great Britain taken in addition, to
discharge the additional obligation for the improvement of Armenia which
she assumed by the so-called Cyprus Convention?
We find that in November, 1879, the English Government, seeing that
matters throughout Asia Minor were really going from bad to worse, went
the length of ordering an English squadron to the Archipelago for the
purpose of a naval demonstration. The Turkish Government was greatly
excited, and with a view to getting the order countermanded, made the
fairest promises.
But England was not the only Power aroused. On June 11, 1880, an
Identical Note of the Great Powers demanded the execution of the clauses
of the Treaty of Berlin which had remained in suspense. In the
conclusion of the Identical Note a clear recognition is made of the fact
that _the interest of Europe, as well as that of the Ottoman Empire,
requires the execution of the Sixty-first Article of the Treaty of
Berlin, and that the joint and incessant action of the Powers can alone
bring about this result_.
On July 5th, the Turkish Foreign Minister sent a Note in reply to the
representatives of the Powers. “It is of great length and small real
value, except as combining in a remarkable degree the distinguishing
characteristics of modern Ottoman diplomacy, namely, first, great
facility in assimilating the administrative and constitutional jargon of
civilized countries; second, consummate cunning in concealing under
deceptive appearances the barbarous reality of deeds and intentions;
third, cool audacity in making promises which there is neither the power
nor desire to make good; and, finally, a paternal and oily tone,
intended to create the impression that the Turkish Government is the
victim of unjust prejudices and odious calumnies.”
As soon as the reply of the Porte was received, Earl Granville sent
copies to the British Consuls in Asia Minor, inviting observations
thereon. Eight detailed replies to this request are published in the
Blue-Book.[22] They concur in a crushing condemnation of the Ottoman
Government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account