The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
But in this hour, when our hearts are stirred by the lot of our
co-religionists under the Crescent, let us not forget that the Moslem
population almost equally is cursed and impoverished by Turkish misrule,
venality, and taxation. They drink the cup of woe, all but the more
bitter dregs of religious persecution, which is reserved for Christian
lips. Their benumbed condition, natural stolidity, and unquestioning
obedience to Islam, a creed whose cardinal principle is submission,[33]
accounts for the fact that they do not appear as a factor of the
problem. Yet even Mohammedans often secretly come pleading that Europe
take some interest in their case too. In the name of humanity, yes, of
Christianity, let them not be forgotten.
“An Eastern Resident,” writing from Constantinople, in an article
entitled “Sultan Abd-ul-Hamid,” in _The Contemporary Review_, January,
1895, gives an able analysis of the Sultan’s position and policy,
showing at the same time great appreciation of His Majesty as a man. His
position and relations to the Sublime Porte are not well understood by
the public, and could hardly be better stated than in these extracts:
[Illustration:
H. I. M. ABD-UL-HAMID KHAN, THE SULTAN OF TURKEY.
]
“So far as we can judge, the Sultan is a sincere and honest Mohammedan,
and regards himself as a true Caliph—a successor of the Prophet—the
chief defender of the faith, under God the absolute arbiter of its
destinies. He has undoubtedly done his best to reconcile the interests
of the Caliphate with those of the Empire....
“In one particular it [the policy of the Sultan] is condemned by most
enlightened Mohammedans as strongly as by Christians. His attempt to
concentrate the whole administration of the Empire in his own hands has
led to the establishment of a dual government—that of the Palace and the
Porte. The whole machinery of a government exists at the Porte. There
are Ministers and fully organized departments. There is a Council of
Ministers and a Council of State. All business is supposed to pass
through their hands, and the whole administration is supposed to be
subordinate to them. All is, of course, subject to the supreme will of
the Sultan, but his official advisers and his official agents are at the
Porte.
“In fact, however, there is another government at the Palace of Yildiz,
more powerful than the official government, made up of chamberlains,
mollahs, eunuchs, astrologers, and nondescripts, and supported by the
secret police, which spares no one from the Grand Vizier down. The
general policy of the Empire is determined by this government, and the
most important questions of state are often treated and decided, while
the highest officials of the Porte are left in absolute ignorance of
what is going on. It is needless to add that the Porte and the Palace
are at sword’s-point, and block each other’s movements as far as they
can....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account