The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715Wakeman, Henry Offley
History
The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715
Wakeman, Henry Offley
Europe -- History -- 17th century
The crisis was over. The deputation dispersed abashed and afraid for
their own safety. The very next day Thurn arrived before the gates
of the city, and found them shut, and the walls manned. He had not
resources for a siege, and retired back again across the frontier as
quick as he had come. He was only just in time, Bucquoi had at last
received reinforcements from the Spanish Netherlands, and leaving part
of his army to watch Hohenlohe at Budweis suddenly fell upon Mansfeld,
who was marching to join Hohenlohe at Zablat, and completely destroyed
his army. The siege of Budweis was at once raised, and Bucquoi advanced
into south Bohemia driving Hohenlohe before him, until he was suddenly
recalled to defend Pressburg and Vienna from the advance of Bethlen
Gabor, Prince of Transylvania, who had just declared for the Bohemians.
Among those who distinguished themselves at the battle of Zablat was a
Bohemian noble, who commanded one of the Walloon regiments of cavalry,
count Albert von Waldstein.
[Sidenote: =Ferdinand elected Emperor, 1619.=]
Hardly had Ferdinand escaped from the attack of his enemies at Vienna,
than he had to betake himself to Frankfort to support his interests at
the approaching imperial election. At first sight there seemed little
doubt of his success, as he was certain of the three ecclesiastical
votes, which, with his own vote as king of Bohemia, would give him the
majority. But the elector of Saxony took a formal objection to the
exercise by Ferdinand of the Bohemian vote, until the settlement of the
Bohemian question had made it clear that the Crown was rightfully his,
and all felt that it would not be safe to proceed to an election until
so formidable a legal point had been decided. The way therefore was
still open to the Calvinist representatives, the Elector Palatine and
the margrave of Brandenburg, by clever management to avoid the election
of Ferdinand, if they could not actually secure that of their own
nominee. If they had at once supported with their whole strength the
policy of John George, they would have at least postponed the election
of Ferdinand indefinitely, and united the Protestant interest. But the
Elector Palatine, led by Christian of Anhalt, could not bring himself
to play second fiddle to the elector of Saxony. They wished themselves
to be emperor-makers. Christian of Anhalt had gone a weary journey to
Turin to try and make terms with Charles Emmanuel of Savoy. Maximilian
of Bavaria was sounded, but gave a definite refusal, and so it happened
that when the electoral diet met on the 20th of July, the Calvinists
were without a candidate and without a policy. John George, nettled at
seeing his own policy contemptuously set aside and nothing put in its
place, shrank from intrusting the institutions of the Empire to such
rash and incapable hands. He instructed his representative to withdraw
his objection to the vote of Ferdinand for Bohemia, and to record his
own vote in his favour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account