The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the futureOswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Religion
The Bible of nature : $b or, The principles of secularism. A contribution to the religion of the future
Oswald, Felix L. (Felix Leopold)
Secularism
valuable laborer than as a slave, and that emancipation, in the long
run, has benefited the planter as well as his serf. I venture even to
add the verdict of Professor Hagenbeck, the founder of the great
zoölogical supply depot, that menagerie-trainers of the least despotic
methods are the most successful. Turf-men know that the best horses do
not come from the unequaled perennial pastures of the lower Danube, but
from England and Araby, where pet colts enjoy almost the freedom of a
pet child.
C.—PERVERSION.
The ethics of Anti-naturalism include the Buddhistic doctrine of
self-abasement, as an indispensable condition of salvation. That
salvation meant extinction, the utter renunciation of earthly hopes and
desires, the mortification of all natural instincts, including the
instinct of freedom. Abject submission to injustice, the subordination
of reason to dogma, the sinfulness of rebellion against the “powers
that be,” were inculcated with a zeal that made the church an
invaluable ally of despotism. For centuries a scepter combining the
form of a cross and a bludgeon was the significant emblem of tyranny.
With the aid, nay, in the name, of the Christian hierarchy, the despots
of the Middle Ages elaborated a system of subordination of personal
freedom to autocratic caprices, which, by comparison, makes the tyranny
of the Cæsars a model of liberalism. Every important function of social
and domestic life was subjected to the control of arbitrary
functionaries, armed with irresponsible power or with a system of
oppressive penal by-laws. Censors suppressed every symptom of visible
or audible protest. Every school was a prison, every judgment-seat a
star-chamber. Peasants and mechanics had no voice in the councils of
their rulers. The merit of official employees was measured by the
degree of their flunkeyism. But the ne-plus-ultras of physical and
moral despotism were combined in the slavery of the monastic convents.
The attempt of reviving the outrages which abbots for centuries
practiced on the unfortunates whom a rash vow (or often the mandate of
a bigoted parent) had submitted to their power, would certainly expose
the manager of a modern convent to the risk of being mobbed and torn
limb from limb. Novices were subjected to all sorts of wanton tortures
and arbitrary deprivation of his scant privileges; they were compelled
to perform shameful and ridiculous acts of self-abasement, all merely
to “break their worldly spirit,” i.e., crush out the last vestige of
self-respect and life-love, in order to prepare them for the
consolations of other-worldliness. The moral emasculation of the human
race seems, indeed, to have been the main purpose of the educational
policy which the priests of the Nature-hating Galilean pursued wherever
the union of Church and State put children and devotees at the mercy of
their dogmatists.
D.—PENALTIES OF NEGLECT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account