The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introductionElmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
History
The books of Chronicles : $b With maps, notes and introduction
Elmslie, W. A. L. (William Alexander Leslie)
Bible. Chronicles -- Commentaries
It must not be imagined that these facts in any way destroy the value
of the table. _Historically_, it is a document of great importance as a
systematic record of the racial and geographical beliefs of the Hebrews.
Its value would be increased could we determine precisely the period
when it was originally drawn up, but unfortunately it is not possible
to do so with certainty. Arguments based on the resemblance between
this table and the nations mentioned in the books of Ezekiel and
Jeremiah are inconclusive; nor does the fact that the general tables
(verses 5‒9, 17) now form part of P, the “Priestly” document, help us
greatly, for we cannot argue from the date of the document as a whole
to the date of its component laws or traditions, which of course may
be much earlier. _Religiously_, the worth of this table is to be seen
in the conviction of the fundamental unity of the human race, which
is here expressed. The significance of this may best be felt if we
contrast the Greek traditions which display a keen interest in the
origins of their own peoples but none at all in that of the barbarians.
Ancient society in general was vitiated by failure to recognise the
moral obligation involved in our common humanity. Even Israel did not
wholly transcend this danger, and its sense of spiritual pre-eminence
may have taken an unworthy form in Jewish particularism; but at
least, as we here see, there lay beneath the surface the instinct that
ultimately the families of the earth are one, and their God one.
=5‒7= (=Genesis x. 2‒4).
THE SONS OF JAPHETH.
⁵The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan,
and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
=5.= _The sons of Japheth_] The writer begins with the northern peoples.
_Gomer_] to be identified with the _Gimirrai_ of the Assyrian monuments,
the Κιμμέριοι of the Greeks, who migrated from South Russia into Asia
Minor (Pontus and Cappadocia) under the pressure of the Scythians
(Herodotus I. 103; IV. 11, 12; compare Ezekiel xxxviii. 6, Revised
Version).
_Magog_] In Ezekiel xxxviii. 2 (Revised Version) judgement is denounced
on “Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal”
who is represented as accompanied in his migration by the “hordes” of
Gomer and Togarmah (verse 6), “all of them riding upon horses” (verse
15). Magog represents therefore one of several tribes of northern
nomads, possibly the Scythians.
_Madai_] i.e. Media or the Medes. Of the many allusions in the Old
Testament to this famous people, the first is found in 2 Kings xvii. 6;
compare also Isaiah xiii. 17; Jeremiah xxv. 25; Esther i. 3; Daniel i.
9. The Median Empire dates from the 7th century B.C., but the Medes are
referred to by Assyrian inscriptions of the 9th century, at which time
they seem to occupy the mountainous regions to the south and south-west
of the Caspian Sea. They were the first Aryan race to play an important
part in Semitic history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account