The British Campaign in France and Flanders, 1914Doyle, Arthur Conan
History
The British Campaign in France and Flanders, 1914
Doyle, Arthur Conan
World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front
But it is no easy matter to disengage so large an army which is
actually in action and hard-pressed by a numerous and enterprising
enemy. The front was extensive and the lines of retreat were
limited. That the operation was carried out in an orderly fashion is
a testimony to the skill of the General, the talents of the
commanders, and the discipline of the units. If it had been done at
once and simultaneously it would certainly have been the signal for a
vigorous German advance and a possible disaster. The positions were
therefore held, though no efforts were made to retake those points
where the enemy had effected a lodgment. There was no possible use
in wasting troops in regaining positions which would in no case be
held. As dusk fell, a dusk which was lightened by the glare of
burning villages, some of the regiments began slowly to draw off to
the rear. In the early morning of the 24th the definite order to
retire was conveyed to the corps commanders, whilst immediate
measures were taken to withdraw the impedimenta and to clear the
roads.
Such, in its bare outlines, was the action of Mons upon August 23,
interesting for its own sake, but more so as being the first clash
between the British and German armies. One or two questions call for
discussion before the narrative passes on. The most obvious of these
is the question of the bridges. Why were they not blown up in the
dangerous peninsula? {76} Without having any special information
upon the point, one might put forward the speculation that the reason
why they were not at once blown up was that the whole of Joffre's
advance was an aggressive movement for the relief of Namur, and that
the bridges were not destroyed because they would be used in a
subsequent advance. It will always be a subject for speculation as
to what would have occurred had the battle been fought to a finish.
Considering the comparative merits of British and German infantry as
shown in many a subsequent encounter, and allowing for the advantage
that the defence has over the attack, it is probable that the odds
might not have been too great and that Sir John French might have
remained master of the field. That, however, is a matter of opinion.
What is not a matter of opinion is that the other German armies to
the east would have advanced on the heels of the retiring French,
that they would have cut the British off from their Allies, and that
they would have been hard put to it to reach the coast. Therefore,
win or lose, the Army had no possible course open but to retire. The
actual losses of the British were not more than three or four
thousand, the greater part from the 8th, 9th, and 13th Brigades.
There are no means as yet by which the German losses can be taken out
from the general returns, but when one considers the repeated
advances over the open and the constant breaking of the dense
attacking formations, it is impossible that they should have been
fewer than from seven to ten thousand men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account