The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
the life history of the Chilognatha.
A close examination into the minutiae of the growth of the different organs
has shown us that the double characters of the double segments are more
deeply seated than was imagined. The circulatory system, the nerve cord,
and the first traces of segmentation in the mesoblast all show this double
character, and the only single part about the segment is the broad plate
covering the segment. Now in some of the most ancient of the fossil
Myriapods this broad plate shows traces of a division, as if it were in
reality two plates fused together. We have also to consider that the life
history of the Chilognatha allows us to believe that the peculiar
cylindrical shape of the body shown in the greatest degree in the Julidae
is attained by the unequal development of the dorsal and ventral surfaces
of the body; the ventral surface being compressed together till it is
extremely narrow, and the dorsal surface, as it were, growing round it till
the originally dorsal surface forms almost a complete ring round the body.
Taking all this into consideration, we are justified, in my opinion, in
concluding that each double segment in the Chilognatha is not two segments
fused together, nor a single segment bearing two pairs of legs, but is two
complete segments perfect in all particulars, but united by a large dorsal
plate which was originally two plates which have been fused together, and
which in most Chilognatha surrounds almost the whole of two segments in the
form of a ring.
Again in the Chilopoda we see that a great distinctive feature that
separates them from the Chilognatha is the character of the ventral nerve
cord, the cord being double and not single, a character connected with the
fact that the bases of the legs are widely separated from one another, and
not closely approached to each other, as in the Chilognatha. As we before
said, a more {72}minute anatomical examination showed us that this
difference was not so great as appeared at first sight, the cord showing
traces of a duplication. Well, are these traces superficial, or do they
represent a state of affairs more or less similar to that in the Chilopoda?
Embryology helps us to answer this question also. In the early stages of
the Chilognatha we find that the nerve cord has exactly the form of that in
Chilopoda, showing us that the appearances in the anatomy had led us to a
right conclusion, and giving us a valuable confirmation of our views. These
two examples will serve to show the kind of interest which attaches to
embryology.
PALAEONTOLOGY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account