The Patent Roll of 7 Richard II (cf. also _Monasticon_, edited by Oliver, p. 4) should be compared with the Patent Roll of 9 Richard II. The former states that Cnut was the founder of the priory of St. German, while the latter states that Leofric was the founder. Inasmuch as the charter of Cnut required the land of Landrake to be given after Burhwold’s death to St. German for the good of the souls of Cnut and Burhwold (_Terram ... commendat ... Sancto Germano_) it follows that both statements were (and were probably understood to be) legal fictions. The earlier document, however, confirms, if confirmation were needed, the evidence as to the reconstruction of the monastery by Leofric as given in Domesday Book, though it is not necessarily conclusive as to the substitution of regular for secular canons. Preb. Hingeston Randolph (_Architec. Hist. of St. Germans_, p. 31) states that “there is no reason to suppose that Leofric took any steps to found a priory at St. Germans.” The statement is far too sweeping. On the other hand, Mr. Haddan (_Councils_, etc., I, 704) relies upon the _ipsissima verba_ of the Patent Roll for one of his main arguments for a single Cornish see in the days of Cnut. By itself the evidence supplied by an early patent roll relating to a transaction which took place nearly four centuries previously is not conclusive, especially when, as in this case, a legal title was needed in order to settle a dispute, and to place a bishop in undisputed possession of an advowson. Footnote 71: There is a temptation to identify Lanisley with the Lannaledensis of the _Missa S. Germani_ (Haddan and Stubbs, _Councils_, etc., I, 696). Alet, or Aleth, and Idles, in the parish of Kenwyn, are regarded as synonymous, if not identical, in several ancient charters. On the same principle Lanaleth would become Lanidles, a form sufficiently near that of Lanisle to convey the idea of identity. But Mr. Haddan is satisfied that Lanadleth is the British name of St. Germans, and the confusion introduced by the above supposition would be practically insurmountable. Footnote 72: Eglostudic (St. Tudy) and Polrode belonged to St. Petrock in the time of the Confessor, and Tinten may have been claimed for Exeter by virtue of the grant of 909. Footnote 73: At a much earlier date (670) St. Wilfrid claimed ecclesiastical endowments of the British for the Saxon Church in the neighbourhood of Ripon. Footnote 74: Loth, _Les Noms des Saints bretons_, p. 87. Footnote 75: Amaneth may be an English equivalent for Anmanach. Treveneage appears at Trevanek in 1284, and as Trevanaek in 1361. Footnote 76: Loth, _Les Noms des Saints bretons_, pp. 52, 53. Footnote 77: _Hist. of English Law_, i, 33. Footnote 78: The references are to Kilter’s rising in 1549, and to the prolonged defence of Little Dennis by Sir Richard Vyvyan in 1646. Footnote 79: