The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed. — John Shaqi
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
The long quarrel between the Popes and the Hohenstaufen [Sidenote:
Guelfs and Ghibellines.] Emperors bequeathed a fatal heritage to Italy
in the party feuds of Guelfs and Ghibellines. These famous factions not
only set one state against another, but also gave rise to violent
discord within each state. And the parties lasted long after the
original cause of quarrel had come to an end. When the Hohenstaufen had
perished with Manfred and Conradin, when Rudolf of Hapsburg had
abandoned all imperial claims over central and southern Italy, when the
Papacy itself had quitted Italy to find a home on the further boundary
of Provence, it seemed as if party feuds must inevitably die out for
want of the fuel which had originally kindled them. But the blaze of
mutual hatred continued to rage as fiercely as ever. The famous strife
of the _Bianchi_ and _Neri_ in Florence, which drove Dante into exile
from his native city, was fought out when Albert I. and Boniface VIII.
were in close alliance. These stereotyped and quasi-hereditary feuds
were not only destructive of all sense of nationality, but they were
strong enough to overpower the far stronger and more local sentiment of
common citizenship.
Perhaps the strongest of all the disruptive forces in Italy was the
development, in the northern and central provinces, of the municipality
or commune as the normal [Sidenote: The Commune as a political unit.]
unit of political life. This applies not only to the republics proper,
but also to those cities whose liberties were overthrown by the rise of
some dominant family. The subjection of lesser cities by more powerful
neighbours did not create a state in which all subjects stood in an
equal relation of submission to a despotic government, but one in which
subject communes were enslaved by a dominant commune, and were excluded
by it from all voice in the government. The citizens of Pavia and
Cremona were not the direct subjects of the Visconti on a level with the
Milanese themselves. They were the subjects of Milan, and were ruled by
Milanese governors, just as Pisa and Pistoia were ruled by Florentines.
The absorption of the lesser cities continued, until in the fifteenth
century Italy practically consisted of five dominant states—Naples,
Milan, Venice, Florence, and the Papacy. The result was the creation of
a large subject population, deprived of that share in politics which
Italian citizens had learnt in earlier times to consider their dearest
right, and constituting a permanent and dangerous element of discontent.
It was from this population that the condottieri recruited those
mercenary armies to which Italian writers agree in attributing the
disasters that befel their country, and it was this population which
welcomed foreign invasion as a chance of escaping from domestic
oppressions. Commines tells us that the Italians ‘welcomed as saints’
the French army that followed Charles VIII. to Naples, and the phrase is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account