The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
Although the abolition of popular election in 1297 was a change to which
things had long been tending, it could hardly take place without
exciting considerable discontent. Several conspiracies were formed
against the new oligarchy, and after the failure of a formidable plot
under Bajamonte Tiepolo in 1310, it was determined to devise some new
machinery for the detection and repression of future revolts. Ten
members were chosen by [Sidenote: Council of Ten, 1319.] the Great
Council to act as a sort of committee of public safety. So useful did
they prove that they were renewed year after year, and in 1335 they were
made a permanent part of the constitution. The Council really consisted
of seventeen, as the doge and his six councillors were associated with
the Ten. The latter were elected yearly, and could not hold office again
till a year had elapsed. The proper function of the Ten was to act as a
court of exceptional jurisdiction, somewhat like the Star Chamber in
England. In this capacity they served as the efficient bulwark of the
Venetian aristocracy, and coerced the inferior citizens into passive
acquiescence in the rule of their superiors. As time went on, the Ten
became more and more powerful, and began to interfere in the general
conduct of affairs. So great became the passion for secrecy in the
Venetian government, that in the sixteenth century the Ten began to
delegate their functions to a sub-committee, the three Inquisitors of
State.
For sixty years Italy had been allowed to take its own course without
any attempt at interference on the part of its nominal suzerain in
Germany. The news that Henry of [Sidenote: Henry VII. in Italy,
1310-1313.] Luxemburg, elected in 1308, was preparing to visit Italy and
to revive the imperial power, made a profound impression in the
peninsula, where the Guelf and Ghibelline parties were as active and
bellicose as ever. These party names had by this time ceased to express
any essential difference of principle. The imperial suzerainty in the
north, and the papal suzerainty in the south were equally shadowy, and
neither seemed substantial enough to fight for. The idea that the Guelfs
were the champions of republican liberty as against aggressive despots,
had ceased to have any real foundation in facts. A Della Torre was just
as dangerous to the liberties of Milan as a Visconti. Since the Popes
had called in the House of Anjou, and especially since a Pope had fixed
his residence in Avignon, it was impossible to contend that the Guelfs
were the champions of Italian independence against foreign domination.
The anomalous relations of Italian parties were reflected in the equally
anomalous position of Henry VII. A German prince elected by German
princes to the throne of the Hohenstaufen, he seemed destined to revive
the principles of Ghibellinism and to assume the headship of a revived
Ghibelline faction. On the other hand, Henry was French by education and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account