The Coal Measures Amphibia of North AmericaMoodie, Roy Lee
Science
The Coal Measures Amphibia of North America
Moodie, Roy Lee
Amphibians, Fossil -- North America; Paleontology -- Carboniferous; Paleontology -- North America
"Twenty-two footprints made by one animal walking in a straight
course were collected in a slab. They give the impression of having
been made by a bipedal animal for part of the distance, but after the
fourth print of the right foot impressions of the forefeet appear. The
hindfeet had 5 digits, the middle digit being longest and the 2 inside
of it being only slightly shorter and lying close together. Their
outer ends were slender and flexible and usually curved inward toward
the middle toe. The 2 outer digits formed wide angles with the middle
one and were shorter than the inner ones. The second toe was webbed to
within 8 mm. of the tip, the third toe to within 23 mm. of the tip.
The impression of the web is well preserved in only one impression of
the hindfoot.
"The forefeet had 4 digits. The 3 inner digits were subequal in
length, the 2 inner being more flexible and incurved near the ends.
The outer digit is two-thirds as long as the second. The webbing
extends about half the length of the digits. The heel impression is
broader than that of the hindfoot.
"Measurements of _Dromopus aduncus_ Branson.
Tip of toe to tip of toe in first prints 21 cm.
After appearance of forefeet the impressions are the following
distances apart: 165 mm., 40 mm., 85 mm., 70 mm., 80 mm., 40 mm.,
150 mm., then back to 20 and 21 cm.
mm.
Length of hindfeet 60
Width of hindfeet 20 to 25
Length of forefeet 45"
CHAPTER VI.
A HISTORY OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMPHIBIA, WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE
TO THE SPECIES FROM THE COAL MEASURES.
It has been necessary, in the course of the present study, to review
thoroughly the classifications which have been proposed for the group. A
classification of some sort is necessary for the proper grouping of the
species which have been recovered from the Coal Measures deposits of this
continent, and my reason for publishing this relatively dry material is
that the classifications formerly proposed (469), as well as the one here
given, may have a proper historical background.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account