The last of these G̱ẖ̱aznavid princes of Lāhor, Ḵẖ̱usrū Malik, was
deposed in 1187 by Muḥammad bin Sām of G̱ẖ̱or (Mu’izzu-d-dīn of the
coins), who, after the final defeat of Pṛithvīrāj of Ajmer and his
Hindu allies at the second battle of Thāṇeśar or Tarāin, in 1192,
founded the first Muhammadan dynasty of Hindustān, which nevertheless
actually starts with his successor, Qut̤bu-d-dīn Aibak, the first
Sultan to fix his capital at Dehlī. In dealing with the coins of the
five successive dynasties who ruled in Dehlī from 1206 to 1526, it will
be convenient to recognize three periods: (1) from the accession of
Qut̤bu-d-dīn Aibak in 1206 to the death of G̱ẖ̱iyās̤u-d-dīn Tug̱ẖlaq
in 1324, (2) the reign of Muḥammad bin Tug̱ẖlaq 1324-1351, (3) from
the accession of Fīroz Shāh III, 1351, to the death of Ibrāhīm Lodī,
1526°.
I. COINS OF THE EARLY SULTANS, A.D. 1206-1324
(A.H. 602-725)
The gold coins which Muḥammad bin Sām struck in imitation of the issues
of the Hindu kings of Kanauj with the goddess Lakshmī on the obverse,
are, except for the earliest gold issue of Ḥaidar ’Alī of Mysore,
without a parallel in Muhammadan history. He apparently struck no
silver for his Indian dominions; in fact, two centuries of invasion had
so impoverished the country that for forty years the currency consisted
almost entirely of copper and billon: hardly any gold appears to have
been struck, and silver coins of the earlier Sultans are scarce. The
third Sultan, Altamsh[49] (1211-1236), however, issued several types of
the silver tankah (Pl. VIII, 2), the earliest of which has a portrait
of the king on horseback on the obverse. The latest type bears witness
to the diploma of investiture he had received in 1228 from the Khalif
of Bag̱ẖdād, Al-Mustanṣir. The inscriptions run as follows: on the
obverse, “_In the reign of the Imām Al-Mustanṣir, the commander of the
faithful_,” and on the reverse, “_The mighty Sultan Shamsu-d-dunyā
wā-d-dīn, the father of the victorious, Sultan Altamsh_.” Both
legends are enclosed in circles, leaving circular margins in which
are inscribed the name of the mint and the date in Arabic. This type
was followed, sometimes with slight variations, by seven succeeding
Sultans, and although the Khalif actually died in 1242, the words, “_in
the reign of_,” were not dropped until the time of G̱ẖ̱iyās̤u-d-dīn
Balban (1266-1286). Gold, though minted by ’Alāu-d-dīn Mas’ūd,
Nāṣiru-d-dīn Maḥmūd, Balban and Jalālu-d-dīn Ḵẖ̱iljī, was not common
until ’Alāu-d-dīn Muḥammad (1296-1316) had enriched his treasury
by conquests in Southern India. These gold coins (Pl. VIII, 5) are
replicas of the silver in weight and design. Divisional pieces of the
silver tankah are extremely rare. ’Alāu-d-dīn, whose silver issues are
very plentiful, changed the design by dropping the name of the Khalif
from the obverse and substituting the self-laudatory titles, “_The
second Alexander, the right hand of the Khalifate_”; at the same time
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account