The earliest copper of this period is small and insignificant. Some
coins, as well as a few billon pieces, bear the inscription _’adl_,
which may mean simply “legal,” _i.e._ currency (Pl. VIII, 1). Balban
introduced a type with the Sultan’s name and titles divided between
obverse and reverse. All copper is dateless.
The mint names inscribed on the coins of these Sultans sometimes afford
valuable historical evidence of the extent of their dominions. The
general term, _Bilādu-l-hind_, “The Cities of Hind,” is the first to
appear, on the silver of Altamsh. _Dehlī_ is found on the same king’s
billon and copper. _Lakhnautī_, the modern Gaur in Bengal, also occurs
for the first time during this reign; _Sult̤ānpūr_, a town on the Beas
in the Panjāb, on a silver tankah of Balban; _Dāru-l-islām_, “The seat
of Islam” (possibly an ecclesiastical mint in old Dehlī); and _Qila
Deogīr_ on the gold and silver of ’Alāu-d-dīn Muḥammad; while Qut̤bābād
is probably Qut̤bu-d-dīn Mubārak’s designation for Deogīr.
II. THE COINAGE OF MUḤAMMAD BIN TUG̱H̱LAQ,
A.D. 1325-1351 (A.H. 725-752)
Faḵẖ̱ru-d-dīn Jūna, on his coins simply Muḥammad bin Tug̱ẖlaq,
son and murderer of G̱ẖ̱iyās̤u-d-dīn Tug̱ẖlaq, has not unjustly
been called by Thomas “The Prince of moneyers.” Not only do his coins
surpass those of his predecessors in execution and especially in
calligraphy,[53] but his large output of gold, the number of his issues
of all denominations, the interest of the inscriptions, reflecting
his character and activities, his experiments with the coinage,
particularly his forced currency, entitle him to a place among the
greatest moneyers of history. For his earliest gold and silver pieces
he retained the old 172·8 grain standard of his predecessors. His
first experiment was to add to these, in the first year of his reign,
gold _dīnars_ of 201·6 grains (Pl. VIII, 7) and silver _’adlīs_ of
144 grains weight, an innovation aimed apparently at adjusting the
coinage to the actual commercial value of the two metals, which had
changed with the influx of gold into Northern India after the Sultan’s
successful campaigns in the Deccan. But the experiment evidently did
not work; for after the seventh year of the reign these two new pieces
were discontinued.
[53] The fine calligraphy, however, caused the coin to be reduced in
size: all succeeding Sultans reproduced these small thick gold and
silver pieces, but not the fine script, with the unfortunate result
that the mint name which appears in the margin is frequently missing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account