The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
What then was the change that took place on the introduction of the
Exchequer? How did it modify the system previously in existence? Our
only clue is found in the well-known words of the ‘Dialogus’: “Quod
autem hodie dicitur ad scaccarium, olim dicebatur ad taleas.” Writing
as a specialist on Exchequer history, Mr. Hall contends that “this
expression in itself denotes the actual place of receipt and issue
of the revenue rather than a court or council chamber.”[160] But one
cannot see that ‘scaccarium’ in itself denotes a court or council
chamber more than does ‘talea.’ The one was a chequered table, the
other a wooden tally. My own view is that the change really consisted
of the introduction of the chequered table[161] to assist the balancing
of the accounts. Previously, tallies alone would be used, and it
is noteworthy that even after the ‘Exchequer’ system was in full
operation, the deduction for the loss involved by ‘combustion’ was
still effected by tally.[162] I have little doubt that the ‘combustion’
tally was in use in the 11th century for payments “ad arsuram et
pensum.”
Instead, then, of the sheriffs’ accounts being balanced by the cumbrous
system of tallies, the introduction of the Exchequer table, very
possibly under Henry I., enabled them to be depicted to the eye by
an ingenious system of counters. To the modern mind it is strange,
of course, that, while the reformers were about it, they did not
substitute parchment, and work out the accounts on it. But, doubtless
for the benefit of unlearned sheriffs, the old system of ocular
demonstration was still adhered to, and the Treasurer’s Roll merely
recorded the results of the ‘game’ by which the accounts had been
worked out upon the table.
Mr. Hall’s belief is best set forth in an article he contributed to the
‘Athenæum’ (November 27, 1886), and of which he reprinted this passage,
subsequently, in ‘Domesday Studies’ (1891):
There is every reason for believing that the audit machinery
of the ancient Treasury at Winchester was sufficient for the
purpose.... It is true, indeed, that the earliest germ of the
Exchequer is perceptible in these accounts, which were, however,
audited not ‘ad scaccarium,’ but ‘ad taleas,’ _i.e._ in the
Treasury or Receipt at Winchester.... We find in the Pipe Rolls
the old Treasury at Winchester used as a permanent storehouse
for the reserve of treasure, regalia, and records, and we even
find Exchequer business transacted there by way of audit of
accounts, which formed a special office or ‘ministerium’ as late
as 1130 (Pipe Roll 31 Hen. I).[163]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account