The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
It is distinctly asserted, in the above passage, that the ‘firma
comitatus’ only dated from this reform under Henry I.[156] This is
at variance with the strong evidence set forth in my ‘Geoffrey de
Mandeville,’ that Geoffrey’s grandfather, who was dead before this
alleged reform, held Middlesex, Essex, and Herts at farm, the very
amount of the farm due from him being mentioned. But, indeed, in
Domesday itself there are hints, if not actual evidence, that the
‘firma’ was more or less in existence. In Warwickshire, for instance,
“T.R.E. vicecomitatus de Warwic cum burgo et cum regalibus Maneriis
reddebat lxv libras,” etc., etc. In Worcestershire, also, “vicecomes
... de Dominicis Maneriis regis reddit cxxiii lib. et iiii sol. ad
pensum.” Here we have exactly that “summa summarum” of which the
‘Dialogus’ speaks as a novelty introduced under Henry I.[157] Again, in
at least one passage (i. 85), we recognise a distinct allusion to the
“terræ datæ” system:
De hoc Manerio tenet Giso episcopus unum membrum
WETMORE quod ipse tenuit de rege E. Pro eo computat
Willelmus vicecomes in firma regis xii lib. unoquoque anno.
Now we know the history of this manor, which had been detached from the
royal demesne about a quarter of a century before, when Edward gave
it to bishop Giso on his return from his visit to Rome. It follows,
therefore, that £12 must have been, ever since, annually credited
to the sheriff, in consideration of the Crown having alienated this
manor.[158] We thus carry back to a period before the Conquest that
Exchequer practice of the 12th century, which is thus alluded to in
Stephen’s charter to Geoffrey earl of Essex (1141):
Ita tamen quod dominica quæ de prædictis comitatibus data
sunt ... a firma prædicta subtrahantur et ... ad scaccarium
computabuntur.[159]
I hasten to add that the Charter of Constance, the Conqueror’s
daughter, quoted by Stapleton from the Cartulary of Holy Trinity,
Caen, affords an exact parallel in the words: “et ei computabitur in
suo redditu cum dica.” But the fact remains that we can prove the
existence, under Edward the Confessor, of characteristic features
of the later Exchequer system, of which one, at least, as Stapleton
explained, must have been of English origin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account