The Complete Testimony of the Fathers of the First Three Centuries Concerning the Sabbath and First Day — John Shaqi
The Complete Testimony of the Fathers of the First Three Centuries Concerning the Sabbath and First DayAndrews, John Nevins
Religion
The Complete Testimony of the Fathers of the First Three Centuries Concerning the Sabbath and First Day
Andrews, John Nevins
Sabbath; Seventh-Day Adventists; Sunday
"You do not, however, consider the law of the Sabbath: they are
human works, not divine, which it prohibits. For it says, 'Six days
shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the
Sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work.'
What work? Of course your own. The conclusion is, that from the
Sabbath day he removes those works which he had before enjoined for
the six days, that is, your own works; in other words, human works
of daily life. Now, the carrying around of the ark is evidently
not an ordinary daily duty, nor yet a human one; but a rare and
a sacred work, and, as being then ordered by the direct precept
of God, a divine one.... Thus, in the present instance, there is
a clear distinction respecting the Sabbath's prohibition of human
labors, not divine ones. Accordingly, the man who went and gathered
sticks on the Sabbath day was punished with death. For it was his
own work which he did; and this the law forbade. They, however, who
on the Sabbath carried the ark round Jericho, did it with impunity.
For it was not their own work, but God's, which they executed, and
that, too, from his express commandment."
In the following chapter he again cites Isa. 1:11-14, as proof that the
Sabbath is abolished. He will, however, presently explain this text
which he has so many times used against the Sabbath, and show that it
actually has no such bearing. In the meantime he will again declare
that Joshua did not break the Sabbath, and having done this he will
find it in order again to assert that "the Sabbath was actually then
broken by Joshua." In his fourth book against Marcion, chapter xii., he
discusses the question whether Christ as Lord of the Sabbath had the
right to annul the Sabbath, and whether in his life he did actually
violate it. To do this he again cites the case of Jericho, and actually
affirms that the Sabbath was broken on that occasion, and at the same
time denies it. Thus he says:--
"If Christ interfered with the Sabbath, he simply acted after the
Creator's example; inasmuch as in the siege of the city of Jericho
the carrying around the walls of the ark of the covenant for eight
days running, and therefore on a Sabbath day, actually annulled
the Sabbath, by the Creator's command--according to the opinion of
those who think this of Christ [Luke 6:1-5] in their ignorance that
neither Christ nor the Creator violated the Sabbath, as we shall
by-and-by show. And yet the Sabbath was actually then broken by
Joshua, so that the present charge might be alleged also against
Christ."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account