The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
We have here, then, a series of generic types; for the true relations
of which to each other we are indebted to the insight of such workers
as Huxley and Marsh and Lartet, and others. They do not afford us
illustrations of the minute and scarcely observable modifications which
the law of the origin of species involves; they present us rather with
a series of family groups; but the relation between them is such as
to leave the mind accustomed to biological investigations convinced,
that, could we see all the forms that occurred between them, there
could be no question as to the origin of these forms, from _eohippus_
of the oldest eocene beds to _equus_ of to-day. Unlike as in a general
sense they are, they are progressive modifications, with higher and
higher specializations, until, in the extant horse, the highest special
modification is attained.
It will harmonize with no dogma of theology, and no doctrine of
science, to assume that these equine forms, separated by such enormous
epochs of time, were specially created: all accurate knowledge forbids
the supposition; while varieties sufficiently marked, such as the
race-horse, the giant and powerful dray-horse, the Shetland and the
Norman ponies, known to be derived from a common parentage, give the
clearest sanction to the inference, that what we now know of the
geological history of the horse proves it to be a product of the
Darwinian law of evolution; that there has been no total destruction
of equine (or any other) life in the great past; but that there has
been a continuity of it, borne from region to region, and modified
continuously by a thousand changing circumstances. Consequently we
find, in the rocky records of the past, that organic types become
simpler, and liker to each other, as we trace them through the
incomplete geological record to a dim and far off age.
Here, then, we have a series of such generalized types, plainly related
to each other in time, leading us down from the horse of historic times
to less and less specialized forms of it, as the epoch grows more
remote; until in the upper mesozoic or lower eocene beds, we find the
progenitor of the line of the equine types we know, to be an animal
with a splay foot of five toes, adapted to slow movement in a boggy
soil. The slow specialization adapted it to increasing rapidity and
ease of movement, and modified states of soil; acting, without doubt,
as an increasing protection against its enemies, and providing it
with an ever surer means of obtaining abundant and suitable food. And
beneficial variation continued to act until the noble horse, beautiful
in form, exquisitely graceful in action, and swift as the wind, had
been thus created.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account