The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-ParamitaUnknown
Religion
The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita
Unknown
Buddhism; Buddhism -- Sacred books
[1] “Whoever reviles Buddha or his disciple, be he a wandering
mendicant, or a householder, let one know him as an
outcast.”—_Sutta-Nipata_. V. Fausböll.
[2] “Whatever evil deeds these beings have done in a former birth,
deeds that must lead to suffering, those deeds these beings, owing
to their being overcome, after they have seen the Law, will
destroy, and they will obtain the knowledge of Buddha.”—_The
Vagrakkhedika_. Max Müller.
“According to the Buddha ... all men must suffer in their own
persons either in the present life, or in future lives, the
consequences of their own acts.... The penalty of sin could not be
transferred to another—it could only be borne by the sinner
himself, just as the reward of virtue could only be enjoyed by the
virtuous man himself.”—_Hinduism_. Sir Monier Williams.
[3] Literally, “become as doubtful as a fox.”
[4] “For as the method and entire meaning of this Sutra is not to
be described or entirely conceived, so the merit and happy
consequences of accepting it cannot be conceived or
described.”—_Kin-Kong-King_. Beal.
[Chapter 17]
Upon that occasion, the venerable Subhuti addressed the Lord Buddha,
saying: “Honoured of the Worlds! if a good disciple, whether man or
woman, having desired to attain to supreme spiritual wisdom, what
immutable Law shall support the mind of that disciple, and bring into
subjection every inordinate desire?”[1]
The Lord Buddha replied, saying: “A good disciple, whether man or
woman, ought thus to habituate his mind:[2] ‘I must become oblivious
to every idea of sentient life; and having become oblivious to every
idea of sentient life, there is _no one_ to whom the idea of sentient
life has become oblivious.’[3] And why? Because, Subhuti, if an
enlightened disciple retains within his mind such arbitrary ideas of
sentient life as an entity, a being, a living being, or a personality,
he has not attained to supreme spiritual wisdom. And why? Because,
Subhuti, there is no Law by means of which a disciple may be defined
as one having obtained supreme spiritual wisdom.”[4]
The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: “What think you? When the
Lord Buddha was a disciple of Dipankara Buddha, was there bequeathed
to him any Law whereby he attained to supreme spiritual wisdom?”
Subhuti replied, saying: “No! Honoured of the Worlds! inasmuch as I am
able to comprehend the meaning of the Lord Buddha’s discourse, when
the Lord Buddha was a disciple of Dipankara Buddha, there was no Law
bequeathed to him whereby he attained to supreme spiritual wisdom.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account