A French speculator upon such things (I think it was P. Bougeant) felt
this so strongly as to propose the strange hypothesis that fallen
Angels underwent their punishment in the bodies of brutes, wherein
they were incarnate and incarcerate as sentient, suffering and
conscious spirits. The Doctor's theory of progressive life was liable
to no such objections. It reconciled all seeming evil in the lower
creation to the great system of benevolence. But still there remained
a difficulty. Men being what they are, there were cases in which it
seemed that the animal soul would be degraded instead of advanced by
entering into the human form. For example, the Doctor considered the
beast to be very often a much worthier animal than the butcher; the
horse than the horse-jockey or the rider; the cock, than the
cock-fighter; the young whale than the man who harpoons the reasonable
and dutiful creature when it suffers itself to be struck rather than
forsake its wounded mother.
In all these cases indeed, a migration into some better variety of the
civilized biped might be presumed, Archeus bringing good
predispositions and an aptitude for improvement. But when he looked at
a good dog (in the best acceptation of the epithet),—a dog who has
been humanized by human society,—who obeys and loves his master, pines
during his illness, and dies upon his grave, (the fact has frequently
occurred,) the Doctor declared his belief, and with a voice and look
which told that he was speaking from his heart, that such a creature
was ripe for a better world than this, and that in passing through the
condition of humanity it might lose more than it could gain.
The price of a dog might not, among the Jews, be brought into the
House of the Lord, “for any vow,” for it was an abomination to the
Lord. This inhibition occurs in the same part of the Levitical law
which enjoins the Israelites not to deliver up to his master the
servant who had escaped from him; and it is in the spirit of that
injunction, and of those other parts of the Law which are so
beautifully and feelingly humane, that their very tenderness may be
received in proof of their divine origin. It looks upon the dog as
standing to his master in far other relation than his horse or his ox
or his ass,—as a creature connected with him by the moral ties of
companionship and fidelity and friendship.
CHAPTER CXLVI.
DANIEL DOVE VERSUS SENECA AND BEN JONSON. ORLANDO AND HIS HORSE AT
RONCESVALLES. MR. BURCHELL. THE PRINCE OP ORANGE. THE LORD KEEPER
GUILDFORD. REV. MR. HAWTAYN. DR. THOMAS JACKSON. THE ELDER SCALIGER.
EVELYN. AN ANONYMOUS AMERICAN. WALTER LANDOR, AND CAROLINE BOWLES.
——Contented with an humble theme
I pour my stream of panegyric down
The vale of Nature, where it creeps and winds
Among her lovely works with a secure
And unambitious course, reflecting clear,
If not the virtues, yet the worth of brutes.
COWPER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account