The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its propertiesMillikan, Robert Andrews
Philosophy
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
Millikan, Robert Andrews
Electrons
The foregoing experiment leads, however, to results of much more
fundamental importance than that mentioned in the preceding section.
The charge which the droplet had when it first came under observation
had been acquired, not by the capture of ions from the air, but by
the ordinary frictional process involved in blowing the spray. If
then ordinary static charges are built up of electrons, this charge
should be found to be an exact multiple of the ionic charge which had
been found from the most reliable measurement shown in Table V to be
proportional to the velocity .00891. This initial charge on
the drop is seen from equations (9) and (10) to bear the same relation
to () which the ionic charge
bears to (). Now, ,
hence . Dividing
this by 9 we obtain .008931, which is within about one-fifth of 1
[Pg 73]
per cent of the value found in the last column of Table V as the
smallest charge carried by an ion. Our experiment has then given
us for the first time a means of comparing a frictional charge with
the ionic charge, and the frictional charge has in this instance
been found to contain exactly 9 electrons. A more exact means of
making this comparison will be given presently, but suffice it to
say here that experiments like the foregoing have now been tried on
thousands of drops in different media, some of the drops being made of
non-conductors like oil, some of semi-conductors like glycerin, some
of excellent metallic conductors like mercury. In every case, without
a single exception, the initial charge placed upon the drop by the
frictional process, and all of the dozen or more charges which have
resulted from the capture by the drop of a larger or smaller number
of ions, have been found to be exact multiples of the smallest charge
caught from the air. Some of these drops have started with no charge
at all, and one, two, three, four, five, and six elementary charges or
electrons have been picked up. Others have started with seven or eight
units, others with twenty, others with fifty, others with a hundred,
others with a hundred and fifty elementary units, and have picked up in
each case a dozen or two of elementary charges on either side of the
starting-point, so that, in all, drops containing every possible number
of electrons between one and one hundred and fifty have been observed
and the number of electrons which each drop carried has been accurately
counted by the method described. When the number is less than fifty
there is not a whit more uncertainty about this count than there is
in counting one’s own fingers and toes. It is not found possible to
[Pg 74]
determine with certainty the number of electrons in a charge containing
more than one hundred or two hundred of them, for the simple reason
that the method of measurement used fails to detect the difference
between 200 and 201, that is, we cannot measure
with an accuracy greater than one-half of 1 per cent. But it is quite
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account