The Empire Makers: A Romance of Adventure and War in South AfricaNesbit, Hume
Philosophy
The Empire Makers: A Romance of Adventure and War in South Africa
Nesbit, Hume
British -- Africa -- Fiction; South African War, 1899-1902 -- Fiction
He honestly believes in the justice of the curse of Ham; but he believes
more, for, like the Moslem with his women, he says that the dark races
of the earth are like the beasts, soulless; whom to shoot down is no
murder; whom to enslave is his right, as one of the masterful and
heaven-favoured races.
He believes in revenge and hatred as sacred duties. "An eye for an eye,
and a tooth for a tooth," are words which he gloats upon.
According to the patriarchal laws he is a good husband and father, and
will fight for his own like any red Indian. Like all savages, however,
he does not care for fighting in the open. He prefers to skulk behind
rocks, and take his enemy at a disadvantage.
He is a mass of gross superstition; in this he even surpasses the
Kaffir. He believes fervently in ghosts and omens, and dreads the dark
with trembling horror. He is utterly devoid of chivalry, truth, or
common honesty. A pledge in his estimation means only an expedient to
hoodwink his adversary and gain time. He will make a promise at any
time, and break it without the slightest scruple. He laughs at those
who trust him, as fools. Like the wild boar, he hates to see his lair
disturbed. He would much rather trek than live where civilisation is.
He is rude, uncouth, and pre-eminently inhospitable, and prefers his own
ignorance and superstition to enlightenment. By nature he is a morose
and uncompromising savage who has no place among civilised races, and
not the faintest conception of democracy.
His greed is sateless; his audacity boundless; and his sense of
gratitude nil. Philanthropy and mercy are qualities which he despises,
because he cannot understand them. He professes to believe in the
Redeemer of mankind, but he draws his inspirations from the passages of
Scripture that suit his peculiar temperament, and the ethics of
Christianity do not. As a nation, he is as utterly impossible as the
Turk, therefore is completely out of place in the Transvaal.
The past history of the Boers in Africa has proved this beyond dispute.
They have slaughtered mercilessly, and oppressed their neighbours
wherever they have settled. It is only by the strong hand that they
have been kept so far within bounds.
Their principal grievance against us is that we freed their slaves, and
they nurse this grievance with undying hatred. They have murdered our
settlers ruthlessly, betrayed our statesmen, and mocked us for our
weaknesses. They remember their supposed wrongs, and lose no chance of
repaying them by brutality and treachery, and mock at our generosity in
forgetting what they have done.
Ah! the gallant sons we have lost through trusting those ruthless
murderers! England may forget, but what of the mothers, wives, sisters,
fathers, and brothers of those who lie buried, and yet unavenged?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account