Erotic literature -- History and criticism; Psychoanalysis and literature; Sex in literature
A few more traits that may be mentioned, which he felt he had in common
with Jesus, were his aversion to incurring intimate friendships. There
is reason to believe that Jesus did have friends, but Renan, who did
not cultivate friendship (though he had a good friend in Berthelot),
tried to persuade himself that Jesus was also like him in this regard.
Again Renan deemed himself a dreamer, like Jesus, who was, however,
also a man of action. Renan also saw his own effeminacy and kindliness
in Jesus, who, however, vented himself of vigorous utterances.
Renan also fancied he found in Jesus his own inherent hostility to
Jewish culture; his own anti-Semitism. As a matter of fact, Jesus owed
much to Jewish culture, though he wanted the Jews to abandon some of
their customs and to revise the Mosaic laws; the feeling among Jews was
that Jesus, instead of being anti-Semitic, wished to be their leader
and Messiah and King. Renan reads into Jesus his own anti-Semitism.
Those who are familiar with Renan's writings are aware of the many
slurring and contemptuous references he makes to the Jews. In fact,
one of the paradoxes of his life is that with his liberality and
gentleness, with his abandoning of all Christian dogma, he entertains
a bitter feeling towards the people who gave him his ideal man, the
people who originated, even by his own admission, many of Jesus's
maxims. Renan states that Jesus profited immensely by the teachings
of Jesus, son of Sirach, of Rabbi Hillel and of the synagogue. Renan
unjustly made Jesus have his own failing, anti-Semitism.
Strangely enough, Renan's treatment of the story of Jesus (outside of
his giving Jesus traits of his own) has been very largely a Jewish one.
It is for this reason that all devout Christians were offended. Renan
treated Jesus as a man and refused to credit all the legends connected
with him. Renan did not believe that Jesus was born without a human
father; that he was a member of a Trinity; that he could perform
supernatural miracles. In short, Renan did not accept Jesus as a son
of God, though giving him traits almost divine and free from human
frailties. The picture of Jesus in the life is an idealised Jewish
portrayal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account