The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“December is the month,” he begins his letter, “when the city
[Rome] most especially gives itself up to riotous living
(_desudat_). Free licence is allowed to the public luxury. Every
place resounds with the gigantic preparations for eating and
gorging, just as if,” he adds, “the whole year were not a sort of
_Saturnalia_.”
He contrasts with all this waste and gluttony the simplicity and
frugality of Epikurus, who, in a letter to his friend Polyænus,
declares that his own food does not cost him sixpence a day; while his
friend Metrodorus, who had not advanced so far in frugality, expended
the whole of that small sum:--
“Do you ask if that can supply due nourishment? Yes; and pleasure
too. Not, indeed, that fleeting and superficial pleasure which
needs to be perpetually recruited, but a solid and substantial
one. Bread and pearl-barley (_polenta_) certainly is not luxurious
feeding, but it is no little advantage to be able to receive
pleasure from a simple diet of which no change of fortune can
deprive one.... Nature demands bread and water only: no one is poor
in regard to those necessaries.”[28]
Again, Seneca writes:--
“How long shall we weary heaven with petitions for superfluous
luxuries, as though we had not at hand wherewithal to feed
ourselves? How long shall we fill our plains with huge cities? How
long shall the people slave for us unnecessarily? How long shall
countless numbers of ships from every sea bring us provisions for
the consumption of a single month? An Ox is satisfied with the
pasture of an acre or two: one wood suffices for several Elephants.
Man alone supports himself by the pillage of the whole earth and
sea. What! Has Nature indeed given us so insatiable a stomach,
while she has given us so insignificant bodies? No: it is not the
hunger of our stomachs, but insatiable covetousness (_ambitio_)
which costs so much. The slaves of the belly (as says Sallust) are
to be counted in the number of the lower animals, not of men. Nay,
not of them, but rather of the dead.... You might inscribe on their
doors, ‘These have anticipated death.’”--(_Ep._ lx.)
The extreme difficulty of abstinence is oftentimes alleged:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account