The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
To inform the embryo any principle, whether it is the rational soul
or a force derived from the parental organism, must have organs; and
if organs are present, then the embryo is fit to receive the human
soul, as the only objection to its presence is a supposed lack of
organs. To use other principles when the human soul itself could be
present would be a _multiplicatio entium sine necessitate_, which is
a condition repugnant to the universal method of the Creator.
It has been said that the vital activity in the fertilized ovum does
not proceed from the rational soul because, "in the first place, it
results from the fusion of two vital activities, neither of which is
rational; secondly, it results in the formation, by fission, and
differentiation, of two distinct and separate living cells, each
containing within itself a principle of vital activity. Now this
principle of vital activity cannot be a rational soul, for each cell
has its own principle of activity, and in man there is but one soul."
In the first place, that vital activity does _not_ result from the
fusion of two vital activities neither of which is rational. It
results _after_ the nuclei come together, by particular creation,
and replaces their activity--the generation of the last vital force
is the corruption of the first that existed in the separate nuclei,
not a derivative of that first force. Again, when the embryo is
in the two, four, eight cell stage, and so on, there are not two,
four, eight vital principles present, but one. Substantial unity is
essential to life of any kind, no matter how low its grade; and if
each cell had an independent vital principle, any form of resultant
life in the mass would be impossible. An aggregation has no unity of
substance; there would be as many substances or natures as there are
individual beings in the aggregate, no matter whether ordered or in a
mob, consequently no life at all as a life.
The embryo in the two-cell stage is not made up of two independent
organisms, any more than the right and left halves of an adult man
are two independent organisms. The cells in the two-cell stage
of the embryo are the right and left halves of the body, not two
individuals, as has been proved repeatedly by biologists. Roux[42]
punctured with a hot needle one of the cells in the two-cell stage
of a frog embryo without killing the embryo, and it grew into a
half-frog larva. Analogous results were obtained by operating in
the four-cell stage. Later, Pflüger, Schultze, Enders, and Morgan
corroborated the work of Roux. Newport[43] discovered this fact sixty
years ago.
[42] Virchow's Archiv (1888), 114.
[43] _Phil. Trans._, 1854.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account