The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
Unfortunately, no informed person came forward. During the last days of
the War of 1812, commercial firms constantly tried to obtain private
news of the progress of the peace negotiations. There is a pathetic
note of frustration in the _Evening Post’s_ item of Nov. 29, 1814:
“Considering the public entitled to all the information in our power,
we barely mention that there is a London paper of the 28th ult.
in town, which is kept from the public eye at present. We will not
conjecture what the contents are, but merely venture to say that it is
probably something of moment.”
Nor was the news, collected under such great disadvantages, quite as
accurate as news is now required to be. In August, 1805, the evening
papers caused much stir and conjecture in the little city by announcing
that Jefferson had called the Senate together upon important foreign
business. Next day they explained that this false report had originated
with a mischievous young man who had arrived from Philadelphia in
the mail stage, and whose name they would like to learn. Coleman was
somewhat embarrassed two years later to have to state:
We are requested by Mr. Wright to contradict the account published
yesterday of his being lost in crossing the North River.
When in 1810 the town was on tiptoe to learn the President’s January
message to Congress, or as Coleman called it, “the great War-Whoop,”
two conflicting summaries reached the evening papers at once; one
communicated by a gentleman who arrived direct from Washington, and
one obtained through the Philadelphia _Aurora_ from a commercial
express rider. While waiting fuller news, they could only print both
and let readers take their choice. During the spring of 1812, with
war impending, the press was replete with mere gossip and rumor,
sometimes well founded, more often baseless. As late as 1826 there
occurred a striking illustration of the inaccuracy of much that passed
for foreign news, and of the difficulty which truth experienced in
overtaking error. The Greek revolution had broken out in 1821, and the
massacres of Chios and Constantinople, the victory of Marco Bozzaris,
and the death of Byron had kindled a flame of phil-hellenism throughout
America. On April 26, 1826, the Greek stronghold of Missolonghi
was captured. Despite this, late in May there reached New York a
circumstantial account of the relief of Missolonghi, the slaughter
of the Turks, the death of their hated commander Ibrahim, and the
brightening prospect of Greek liberty, all of which the newspapers
spread forth under such captions as “Glorious News From Greece.” Early
in June this was contradicted by the true news. Nevertheless, wrote
Coleman on July 20, “on taking up a late Tennessee newspaper we find
that the ‘Glorious News’ has just reached our western neighbors and
that they are now only beginning to rejoice at the deliverance of
Missolonghi.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account