The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
Kudachef, the Russian Chargé at Vienna, did not content himself with
submitting the request to the Acting Foreign Minister (Baron Macchio)
but to deprive Austria of the flimsy excuse of Berchtold's absence at
Ischl, the Russian Chargé went over the head of the Austrian Acting
Foreign Minister and telegraphed the request for time to Count
Berchtold at Ischl. Let the record tell for itself how this most
reasonable request was made and refused.
The Russian Chargé sent on July 25th the two following telegrams to
the Russian Foreign Minister:
Count Berchtold is at Ischl. Seeing the impossibility of
arriving there in time, I have telegraphed him our proposal
to extend the delay of the ultimatum, and I have repeated it
verbally to Baron Macchio. This latter promised me to
communicate it in time to the Minister of Foreign Affairs,
_but added that he could predict with assurance a
categorical refusal_.[18]
[Footnote 18: Russian _Orange Paper_, No. 11.]
Sequel to my telegram of to-day. Have just received from
Macchio the negative reply of the Austro-Hungarian
Government to our proposal to prolong the delay of the
note.[19]
[Footnote 19: Russian _Orange Paper_, No. 12.]
It is evident from the Russian _Orange Paper_ that that country had no
illusions as to the possibility of a peaceful outcome. Germany has
contended that on July the 24th, before Count Berchtold made his
inopportune visit to Ischl, he sent for the Russian Chargé at Vienna
and assured him that the punitive measures which Austria had
determined to take against Servia at all costs would not involve any
territorial acquisitions.
Of this interview the chief evidence comes indirectly from two
sources, which are not entirely in accord.
In a telegram from the German Ambassador at Vienna to the German
Chancellor, dated July 24th, it is said:
Count Berchtold to-day summoned the Russian Chargé
d'Affaires in order to explain to him in detail and in
friendly terms the position of Austria regarding Servia.
After going over the historical developments of the last few
years, he laid stress on the statement that the monarchy
did not wish to appear against Servia in the rôle of a
conqueror. He said that Austria-Hungary would demand no
territory, that the step was merely a definitive measure
against Servian machinations; that Austria-Hungary felt
herself obliged to exact guarantees for the future friendly
behavior of Servia toward the monarchy; that he had no
intention of bringing about a shifting of the balance of
power in the Balkans. The Chargé d'Affaires, who as yet had
no instructions from St. Petersburg, took the explanations
of the Minister _ad referendum_ adding that he would
immediately transmit them to Sazonof.[20]
[Footnote 20: German _White Paper_, No. 3.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account