Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
Nevertheless, Kant deserted this point of view at times, particularly
in several remarkable passages which I have dealt with at length in my
_Natural History of Creation_ (chap. v), where he expresses himself in
the opposite, or monistic, sense. In fact, these passages would justify
one, as I showed, in claiming his support for the theory of evolution.
However, these monistic passages are only stray gleams of light; as a
rule, Kant adheres in biology to the obscure dualistic ideas, according
to which the forces at work in inorganic nature are quite different
from those of the organic world. This dualistic system prevails in
academic philosophy to-day—most of our philosophers still regarding
these two provinces as totally distinct. They put, on the one side, the
inorganic or “lifeless” world, in which there are at work only
mechanical laws, acting necessarily and without design; and, on the
other, the province of organic nature, in which none of the phenomena
can be properly understood, either as regards their inner nature or
their origin, except in the light of preconceived design, carried out
by final or purposive causes.
The prevalence of this unfortunate dualistic prejudice prevented the
problem of the origin of species, and the connected question of the
origin of man, from being regarded by the bulk of people as a
scientific question at all until 1859. Nevertheless, a few
distinguished students, free from the current prejudice, began, at the
commencement of the nineteenth century, to make a serious attack on the
problem. The merit of this attaches particularly to what is known as
“the older school of natural philosophy,” which has been so much
misrepresented, and which included Jean Lamarck, Buffon, Geoffroy St.
Hilaire, and Blainville in France; Wolfgang Goethe, Reinhold
Treviranus, Schelling, and Lorentz Oken in Germany [and Erasmus Darwin
in England].
The gifted natural philosopher who treated this difficult question with
the greatest sagacity and comprehensiveness was Jean Lamarck. He was
born at Bazentin, in Picardy, on August 1st, 1744; he was the son of a
clergyman, and was destined for the Church. But he turned to seek glory
in the army, and eventually devoted himself to science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account