The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to EinsteinD'Abro, A. (Aram)
Science
The evolution of scientific thought from Newton to Einstein
D'Abro, A. (Aram)
Relativity (Physics); Science -- Methodology
Now the question arises, What is the nature of this metrical field?
Is it merely a name we are giving to the structure of space caused
by matter? This view appears impossible, for space of itself, being
a mere void, is not amenable to structure. Is the metrical field a
direct emanation from matter, a rarefied form of matter? Or again is
it a reality of a category differing from matter (call it the ether),
which in the absence of matter would be amorphous, and which could
only be forced into a structure by the influences due to matter and
transmitted from place to place through the ethereal substance? In this
case we should again be led to the view that what we commonly call the
structure or geometry of real space reduces to the structure of the
matter-moulded ether-filling space.
Riemann’s exceedingly speculative ideas on the subject of the metrical
field were practically ignored in his day, save by the English
mathematician Clifford, who translated Riemann’s works, prefacing them
to his own discovery of the non-Euclidean Clifford space. Clifford
realised the potential importance of the new ideas and suggested that
matter itself might be accounted for in terms of these local variations
of the non-Euclideanism of space, thus inverting in a certain sense
Riemann’s ideas. But in Clifford’s day this belief was mathematically
untenable. Furthermore, the physical exploration of space, even in the
interior of liquids, seemed to yield unvarying Euclideanism. And here
the remarkable irony of the whole situation must be noted. Although
experimenters had utilised the most refined apparatus for detecting a
possible non-Euclideanism of space and had failed in their efforts, it
was reserved for the theoretical investigator Einstein, by a stupendous
effort of rational thought, based on a few flimsy empirical clues, to
unravel the mystery and to lead Riemann’s ideas to victory.[16] Nor
were Clifford’s hopes disappointed, for the varying non-Euclideanism of
the continuum was to reveal the mysterious secret of gravitation, and
perhaps also of matter, motion and electricity.
[Pg 59]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account