The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
At the commencement, the first digit of any number, might be
distinguished by a previous uniform continuance of the light during ten
or twenty seconds, whilst the separation of each digit from the next in
order might be denoted by a short pause of two or three or more seconds.
Thus, if the number of a light-house were 253: after a cessation of any
obscuration during ten seconds, two occultations should follow each
other at intervals of about a second. A pause should then occur during
three seconds, after which five occultations should occur, at intervals
of one second, as before. Another pause of three seconds must then
happen, and be succeeded by three other occultations occurring at
intervals of one second each; after which ten seconds must elapse before
the cycle thus described is repeated.
These might be thus represented:—
2 hundreds. 5 tens. 3 units.
0000000000·0·000·0·0·0·0·000·0·0·0000000000
\-------------------------------/
Thus, at about every half minute the number of the lighthouse would be
repeated.
In this manner any number under 1,000 may be expressed in less than one
minute; since the largest, 999, would require
Seconds.
For each digit 9, or in all 27
Two short pauses between the digits 6
One long long pause at end of the number 10
---
43
Every light-house, therefore, would be continually repeating its own
number.
It would contribute still more to prevent mistakes, if the light-houses
on a coast were not numbered in succession; for should any mistake be
made in counting the obscurations, it would most probably be detected if
the digits of the numbers of the light-houses on the same part of the
coast were as different as possible.
Lighthouse numbered in succession—
234 235 236 237 238
Ditto irregularly—
142 324 581 787 612
If a mistake of a single obscuration were made in the units of the
number 237, and it had been counted 236, this observation might, until
repeated, mislead the sailor, and induce him to suppose himself opposite
the preceding light-house. On the contrary, if the irregular mode of
numbering were adopted, the mistake of 786 for 787 could not mislead,
because the seven in the hundreds place would point out the error. It
would, however, be better to have the figure in the tens’ place also
different in any two light-houses so near that a possibility of mistake
is likely to occur. The general benefit which would result to all
maritime nations, renders the practical application of these principles
a peculiarly fit subject for a prize.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account